Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Tyler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$69kHealth$63kYouth Development$43kInternational$28kHuman Services$21kCrime & Legal$10kEducation$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$35k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRISON BOOK PROGRAM$5,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$3,500
CARE$3,500
ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY$3,500
INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART$3,000
MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORP$3,000
HANDEL & HAYDN SOCIETY$2,000
HOPES DOOR$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BOSTON$1,500
JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER$1,500
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL TRUST$1,000
VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR THE ARTS OF MASSACHUSETTS$800
BOSTON DANCE THEATER$700
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PRISON BOOK PROGRAM: $5k → 7%BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL TRUST: $2k → 16%HARM REDUCTION COALITION: $5k → 17%PRISON BOOK PROGRAM: $5k → 7%HARM REDUCTION COALITION: $5k → 17%HOPES DOOR: $2k → 9%HANDEL & HAYDN SOCIETY: $10k → 16%HOPES DOOR: $2k → 9%HANDEL & HAYDN SOCIETY: $6k → 16%HANDEL & HAYDN SOCIETY: $6k → 16%CARE: $7k → 8%HANDEL & HAYDN SOCIETY: $6k → 16%CARE: $4k → 8%HANDEL & HAYDN SOCIETY: $5k → 16%CARE: $4k → 8%CARE: $4k → 8%CARE: $4k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $6k → 16%CARE: $4k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $4k → 16%CARE: $4k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $4k → 16%MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORP: $6k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $3k → 16%MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORP: $3k → 8%MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORP: $3k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $3k → 16%MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORP: $3k → 8%MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORP: $3k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $3k → 16%MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORP: $3k → 8%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3k → 16%MCLEAN HOSPITAL CORP: $3k → 8%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3k → 16%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3k → 16%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3k → 16%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $6k → 16%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3k → 16%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BOSTON: $4k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BOSTON: $3k → 16%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $7k → 16%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $4k → 16%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $4k → 16%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $4k → 16%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $4k → 16%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $4k → 16%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$236k · 16 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$236k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+41%

Still filing today

81%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +36%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +36%
  • AF
    ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • WC
    WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +33%
  • AB
    ARTS & BUSINESS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $800
  • RAW ART WORKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $700 · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Boston Ballet Inc

The heart of Boston Ballet is the human experience. Through our living and breathing art, we forge human connections-between artist and attendee, teacher and trainee, friend and newcomer, one's outer and inner self. Dance history is human…

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Center for the Arts Inc

Boston center for the arts (bca) is a not-for-profit performing and visual arts campus that supports working artists to create, perform, and exhibit new works; develops new audiences; and connects the arts to the community.

Arts & Culture
4
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
5
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
6
The British Academy of Film and Television Arts North America Inc

The specific purposes for which bafta na is organized is to promote, maintain, improve and advance original and creative work among individuals employed professionally in film and television production and allied industries, to create and…

Arts & Culture
7
The Theatre At Boston Court

Boston court creates and nurtures innovative, boundary-pushing art that invokes the power of collective imagination to illuminate our common humanity.

Arts & Culture
8
The Wang Center for the Performing Arts Inc

The boch center operates and maintains two iconic venues and provides performing arts entertainment and cultural educational experiences to the general public.

Arts & Culture
9
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
10
Bristol Riverside Theatre Co Inc

To engage audiences and artists alike with exceptional performances, inspired writing and superior productions that motivate us to think harder, to feel more deeply, to laugh more fully and to reflect on ourselves and the world in which we…

Arts & Culture
11
Ht Dance Company Inc Chen Dance Center

H.T. Dance Company Inc./Chen Dance Center's programs and activities reflect its ongoing mission to provide moving experiences in Asian-American arts and contemporary dance through artistic creation, arts education, and presentation.

12
American Repertory Theatre Co Inc

Seeks to expand the boundaries of theater, producing, performing and presenting works of literary, experimental and educational value. provide a home for outstanding artists, a training ground for young artists (including an extensive…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prison Book Program and the most unlike its peers is The Lef Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY — $37,000 · Arts & CultureHANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETYARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC — $28,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INCTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $22,700 · Arts & CultureTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INCBOSTON DANCE THEATER — $4,900 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $2,500 · Arts & CultureMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $24,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORP…MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $20,500 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPI…HOPES DOOR INC — $6,000 · OtherHOPES DOOR INCTHE LEF FOUNDATION — $3,000 · OtherPRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE FBO HKSIARA — $2,000 · Other+3 more — $2,300 · OtherCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $28,100 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE F…NATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION — $10,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation — $8,000 · HealthGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC — $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentPRISON BOOK PROGRAM — $10,000 · Crime & LegalWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $1,000 · Animals
Arts & Culture$95,100Other$57,800International$28,100Health$18,500Human Services$15,000Youth Development$14,000Crime & Legal$10,000Animals$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY — $37,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $28,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC — $28,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $22,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC — $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION — $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON BOOK PROGRAM — $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPES DOOR INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON DANCE THEATER — $4,900 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LEF FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAW ART WORKS INC — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
  • Who funds ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION
  • Who funds PRISON BOOK PROGRAM
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds HOPES DOOR INC
  • Who funds BOSTON DANCE THEATER
  • Who funds THE LEF FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC
  • Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Tyler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Raw Art Works Inc7% of income from government
  • Boston Dance Theater4% of income from government
  • Handel and Haydn Society2% of income from government
  • Artists for Humanity Inc2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc2% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Tyler Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Tyler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph