Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tod and Maxine McClaskey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$525k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$8.1MHealth$1.7MHousing & Shelter$1.3MYouth Development$349kFood & Nutrition$302kRecreation & Sports$228kHuman Services$120kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $355k
  • $250k+1 grant · $525k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARK COLLEGE FOUNDATION$525,000
SETON CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREPATORY$125,000
PEACEHEALTH SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$125,000
OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES$105,000
CLARK COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION$25,000
SHARE VANCOUVER$15,000
CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK$15,000
NW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$15,000
FISH OF VANCOUVER$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON$12,900
NW PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$10,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$10,000
WSU FOUNDATION - VANCOUVER CAMPUS$5,000
THE CHILDREN'S CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $60k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $15k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $10k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $10k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 26 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
8

Total granted

$12M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+140%

Still filing today

54%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +143%
  • WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +42%
  • OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +140%
  • OF
    OHSU FOUNDATION CASEY EYE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE LAKE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cares of Washington

Support people with disabilities and low incomes to realize their purpose, potential and strength.

Employment
2
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
3
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
4
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
5
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
6
Washington Vocational Services

To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…

Employment
7
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
8
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
9
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
10
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
11
Central Washington University Foundation

In partnership with cwu and our donors, our mission is to transform the lives of current and future generations of students by developing and stewarding resources that provide access, opportunity, and hope.

—
12
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peacehealth Southwest Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION: $3,937,724 · EducationCLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATIONWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,045,000 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $47,144 · EducationSETON CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREPATORY SCHOOL: $1,710,000 · OtherSETON CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREPATO…SALMON CREEK MEDICAL HOSPITAL: $350,000 · OtherSALMON CREEK MEDICAL HOSPITALSETON CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREPATORY: $270,000 · OtherSETON CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREPATO…CHILDREN'S CENTER: $241,973 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTERCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $115,000 · Other+17 more: $598,600 · Other+17 moreOPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1,210,100 · Housing & ShelterOPEN HOUSE …PEACEHEALTH SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $975,000 · HealthPEACEHEALT…Northwest Parkinsons Foundation: $60,000 · HealthNorthwest …DAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES: $50,000 · Health+2 more: $11,000 · HealthBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $273,775 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentFISH OF VANCOUVER: $100,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $87,000 · Food & NutritionTHE PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER AND CLARK COUNTY: $75,000 · Environment
Education$6,029,868Other$3,285,573Housing & Shelter$1,210,100Health$1,096,000Youth Development$298,775Human Services$100,000Food & Nutrition$87,000Environment$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION: $3,937,724 over 9y, 8.4% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,045,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetOPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1,210,100 over 9y, 11% of budgetPEACEHEALTH SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $975,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $273,775 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER: $241,973 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $115,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFISH OF VANCOUVER: $100,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $87,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSHARE: $85,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER AND CLARK COUNTY: $75,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetNorthwest Parkinsons Foundation: $60,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetDAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $47,144 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOSPICE SOUTHWEST WA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds PEACEHEALTH SOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF VANCOUVER ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE ↗
  • Who funds THE PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION OF VANCOUVER AND CLARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Parkinsons Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds VANCOUVER SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HOSPICE SOUTHWEST WA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Firstenburg FoundationWA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · Clark County Food Bank · Beaches Summertime Cruisin' · Columbia Community Credit Union · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Hidden Charitable Trust · Anna C Macaskill Schwab and Dwight L Schwab · Kmr Group Foundation · Southwest Washington Regional Health Alliance · The Swigert Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tod and Maxine McClaskey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tod and Maxine McClaskey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Tod and Maxine McClaskey Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Tod and Maxine McClaskey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tod and Maxine McClaskey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph