Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Tioga Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$985k
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$2.4MPhilanthropy$1.1MHousing & Shelter$898kHuman Services$893kArts & Culture$610kEducation$369kFood & Nutrition$121kCrime & Legal$112kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $705k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$150,000
CHOP FOUNDATION$125,000
Individual grant recipient$120,000
JFCS - OUR CLOSET IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD$110,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL$100,000
PLAY ON PHILLY$100,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$35,000
MATERNITY CARE COALITION$30,000
LAUREL HOUSE$30,000
TREE HOUSE BOOKS$25,000
JEVS HUMAN SERVICES$25,000
BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL$25,000
WE PAC-WEST PHILADELPHIA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$20,000
WORK TO RIDE$20,000
GAMER OUTREACH FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ALPERT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3k → 11%AMERICA'S GROW-A-ROW: $2k → 4%FAMILY CONNECTION OF EASTON: $3k → 11%FAMILY CONNECTION OF EASTON: $2k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%LAUREL HOUSE: $76k → 7%LAUREL HOUSE: $30k → 7%LAUREL HOUSE: $30k → 7%LAUREL HOUSE: $28k → 7%LAUREL HOUSE: $25k → 7%LAUREL HOUSE: $20k → 7%LAUREL HOUSE: $3k → 7%LAUREL HOUSE: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.4M · 41 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
37

Total granted

$5.4M
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+46%

Still filing today

61%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
    7× · 2017–2023 · $616k · revenue +2%
  • PO
    PLAY ON PHILLY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $609k · revenue +9%
  • MC
    Maternity Care Coalition
    8× · 2017–2024 · $333k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • SS
    SHIPLEY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +18%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +3%
  • TS
    The Schuylkill Center For Environmental Educationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
3
Children First Pa

Summary

Human Services
4
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
5
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Joseph J Peters Institute

JJPI is a specialized organization that provides prevention and treatment services in the areas of sexual and interpersonal violence, post-traumatic stress disorder and other forms of trauma, infant and early childhood mental health, and…

Crime & Legal
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service of Greater Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is Starkey Hearing Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Military Veterans SupportVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringPregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%10%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr15%18%35–55yr17%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr17%63%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/54
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,108

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
41/49
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHOP FOUNDATION — $1,812,500 · OtherCHOP FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $817,359 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+62 more — $838,166 · Other+62 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $1,078,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION …+2 more — $26,750 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $615,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY…LAUREL HOUSE — $213,500 · Human ServicesLAUREL HOUSE+5 more — $18,750 · Human ServicesPLAY ON PHILLY — $608,700 · Arts & CulturePLAY ON PH…Maternity Care Coalition — $332,500 · HealthTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $125,000 · Health+7 more — $16,800 · HealthTREE HOUSE BOOKS — $147,500 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $65,000 · EducationSHIPLEY SCHOOL — $40,000 · Education+2 more — $4,300 · EducationYOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC — $111,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,468,025Philanthropy$1,104,750Human Services$847,750Arts & Culture$608,700Health$474,300Education$256,800Crime & Legal$111,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $1,078,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $615,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetPLAY ON PHILLY — $608,700 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetMaternity Care Coalition — $332,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLAUREL HOUSE — $213,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetTREE HOUSE BOOKS — $147,500 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC — $111,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $95,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWEST PHILADELPHIA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN — $70,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHIPLEY SCHOOL — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEVS HUMAN SERVICES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORK TO RIDE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSERENITY CLUB OF YORK COUNTY — $20,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetThe Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education — $16,156 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE FOR THE INNER CITY INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $7,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCINCO CHARITIES INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $6,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTION OF EASTON INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTORM THE HEAVENS — $3,250 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHOUSTON METRO AREA POLICE FOUNDATION LLC — $3,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTER OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY — $2,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FERD AND GLADYS ALPERT JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICE OF PALM BEACH C OUNTY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYORK PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HAVEN MEN'S SHELTER — $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmericas Grow-A-Row — $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation — $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStarkey Hearing Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGO2 For Lung Cancer — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEADSTRONG FOUNDATION — $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds PLAY ON PHILLY
  • Who funds Maternity Care Coalition
  • Who funds LAUREL HOUSE
  • Who funds TREE HOUSE BOOKS
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC
  • Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
  • Who funds WEST PHILADELPHIA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SHIPLEY SCHOOL
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEVS HUMAN SERVICES
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds WORK TO RIDE INC
  • Who funds SERENITY CLUB OF YORK COUNTY
  • Who funds The Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education
  • Who funds GAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOPE FOR THE INNER CITY INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds CINCO CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds HIAS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA22.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Claneil Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Children Can Shape the Future Inc · The Allen Hilles Fund · Union Benevolent Association · Pincus Family Foundation · Connelly Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Tioga Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Tioga Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Tioga Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph