Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thomas Rosato Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$375k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$664kEducation$369kEnvironment$212kHuman Services$208kPublic Benefit$89kRecreation & Sports$86kAnimals$80kPhilanthropy$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$6,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT$100,000
LEGADO DE ESPERANZA FOUNDATION$30,500
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$25,000
CENTRO DE ENSENANZA CORAL CEC$16,000
PETSMART CHARITIES INC$15,000
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$15,000
TURNING POINT USA INC$15,000
AMURTEL INC$15,000
SEMPER FI & AMERICAS FUND$12,500
WWP INC - WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$12,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC$10,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO$10,000
UPPER MERION PARK & HISTORIC FOUNDATION$7,000
MAIN LINE DEPUTY DOG$6,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($1.6M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($246k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%MAIN LINE DEPUTY DOG: $6k → 6%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%SPECTRUM INC: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
NY
MA
IA
PA
CA
WV
MD
DE
AZ
KS
DC
FL

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($246k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Dominican Republic$177k · 7 grants
DO$69k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Thomas Rosato Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Thomas Rosato Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 36 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
7

Total granted

$2.0M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-1%

Still filing today

86%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DR
    DOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $600k · revenue +35%
  • LD
    LEGADO DE ESPERANZA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +22%
  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • AM
    Ananda Marga Universal Relief Team Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue -3%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
5
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
6
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Adirondack Land Trust Inc

To forever conserve the forests, farmlands, waters and wild places that advance the quality of life of our communities and the ecological integrity of the adirondacks.

Environment
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Public Responsibility in Medicine & Research Inc

Prim&r advances the highest ethical standards in the conduct of biomedical, behavioral and social science research. prim&r accomplishes this mission through education, membership services, professional certification, public policy…

Health
12
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ludwig's Corner Horse Show Association Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
30/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRO DE ENSENANZA CORAL CEC: $180,900 · OtherCENTRO DE ENSENANZA CORAL CECLEGADO DE ESPERANZA FOUNDATION: $178,223 · OtherLEGADO DE ESPERANZA FOUNDATIONCENTRO DE APRENDIZAJE DESARROLLO INTEGRAL CADIN: $81,000 · OtherCENTRO DE APRENDIZAJE DESARROLLO INTEGRAL CADINSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $59,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INCFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · OtherUPPER MERION PARK & HISTORIC FOUNDATION: $43,500 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $72,500 · OtherSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUNDLudwig's Corner Horse Show Association Foundation: $42,500 · OtherADIRONDACK SKI TOURING COUNCIL INC: $42,000 · OtherTHE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM: $38,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $37,000 · Other+14 more: $106,500 · Other+14 moreDOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT INC: $600,000 · InternationalDOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND …Amurtel Inc: $30,000 · International+2 more: $16,100 · InternationalTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $115,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $18,000 · EducationALPINE ASCENTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $37,000 · EnvironmentADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC: $31,000 · EnvironmentAppalachian Mountain Club: $30,000 · EnvironmentGRACE HUDOWALSKI CHARITABLE TRUST: $29,000 · Environment+1 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $54,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $52,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $16,000 · Human ServicesMAIN LINE DEPUTY DOG: $6,000 · Human ServicesPETSMART CHARITIES INC: $50,000 · AnimalsFRANCISVALE HOME FOR SMALLER ANIMALS: $33,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $20,000 · AnimalsDOGS AND CATS OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $87,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE: $17,000 · Public Benefit
Other$958,123International$646,100Education$138,000Environment$129,000Human Services$128,500Animals$108,000Public Benefit$104,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT INC: $600,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetLEGADO DE ESPERANZA FOUNDATION: $178,223 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $115,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $87,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $72,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $59,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $54,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $52,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPETSMART CHARITIES INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER MERION PARK & HISTORIC FOUNDATION: $43,500 over 9y, 8.2% of budgetLudwig's Corner Horse Show Association Foundation: $42,500 over 7y, 12% of budgetADIRONDACK SKI TOURING COUNCIL INC: $42,000 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetTHE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM: $38,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $37,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $37,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISVALE HOME FOR SMALLER ANIMALS: $33,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC: $31,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $30,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmurtel Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetGRACE HUDOWALSKI CHARITABLE TRUST: $29,000 over 7y, 58% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUpper Merion Police Association: $15,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetAnanda Marga Universal Relief Team Inc (AMURT): $14,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOGS AND CATS OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS AFRICA: $2,100 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMain Line Animal Rescue Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGADO DE ESPERANZA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PETSMART CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER MERION PARK & HISTORIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ludwig's Corner Horse Show Association Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK SKI TOURING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM ↗
  • Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISVALE HOME FOR SMALLER ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds Amurtel Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRACE HUDOWALSKI CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Upper Merion Police Association ↗
  • Who funds Ananda Marga Universal Relief Team Inc (AMURT) ↗
  • Who funds MAIN LINE DEPUTY DOG ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOGS AND CATS OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ALPINE ASCENTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideVA11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thomas Rosato Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thomas Rosato Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Dominican Republic Education and Mentoring Project Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Thomas Rosato Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Thomas Rosato Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas Rosato’s filings →

More from the funding graph