Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thomas L and Kathleen G Bindley Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$129k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$450kEducation$278kHealth$186kInternational$102kYouth Development$96kSocial Science$37kHousing & Shelter$28kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $71k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$884k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$17,500
BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES$12,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$11,000
HANDS TOGETHER$10,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$10,000
AID FOR WOMEN$10,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO$6,000
LEARN TO EARN SOUTH AFRICA$6,000
BY THE HAND CLUB FOR KIDS$5,000
ST ALBANS SCHOOL$5,000
CRU$3,000
HOPE FOR SILENT VOICES$3,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$3,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$2,500
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND: $500 → 11%OPERATION HEALING FORCES: $1k → 13%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $2k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $2k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $1k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $500 → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $500 → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
NE
VA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 56 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
18

Total granted

$1.2M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+25%

Still filing today

36%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AID FOR WOMEN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $121k · revenue +256%
  • BU
    BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +207%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $45k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHICAGO CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -95%
  • VC
    Vigo County Historical Society Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • TI
    THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
3
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
4
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
5
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
8
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
9
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
26/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $142,500 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMYAID FOR WOMEN INC: $120,550 · OtherAID FOR WOMEN INCBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $99,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INCCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $88,600 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $75,286 · OtherAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETYST WILLIAM CHURCH: $37,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $36,500 · OtherPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL FOUNDATION OF THE D OF C: $35,000 · OtherCRU: $32,000 · Other+52 more: $267,400 · Other+52 moreHands Together Inc: $80,000 · InternationalHands Togethe…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $73,250 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEV…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $30,000 · ReligionMens Golf Fellowship Inc: $22,500 · ReligionAMERSON MUSIC MINISTRIES: $21,000 · ReligionDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $45,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $15,500 · EducationBRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP: $6,000 · EducationSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationChicago Bible Society: $11,000 · Crime & LegalFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $6,500 · Human ServicesOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $500 · Human Services
Other$933,836International$154,250Religion$73,500Health$46,000Education$23,000Crime & Legal$11,000Human Services$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAID FOR WOMEN INC: $120,550 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $99,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHands Together Inc: $80,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $73,250 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMens Golf Fellowship Inc: $22,500 over 9y, 14% of budgetAMERSON MUSIC MINISTRIES: $21,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetBy The Hand Club For Kids: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $15,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Bible Society: $11,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $7,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $6,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP: $6,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOME INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVigo County Historical Society Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WESTERN AMATEUR INC: $1,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetFREE SPIRIT MEDIA NFP: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIVE POINTS MUSIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWARRIORS HOMES OF COLLIER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS OF SHELTER INT'L INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKOKIE COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRUSHWOOD CENTER AT RYERSON WOODS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AID FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Hands Together Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Mens Golf Fellowship Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERSON MUSIC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds By The Hand Club For Kids ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Bible Society ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY11.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thomas L and Kathleen G Bindley Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thomas L and Kathleen G Bindley Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas L and Kathleen G Bindley’s filings →

More from the funding graph