Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thelen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$99kPhilanthropy$68kEducation$30kHuman Services$28kArts & Culture$7kYouth Development$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$532k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Camp Fish Tales$5,000
Midland Street Merchants Association$2,500
Good Sumaritan Rescue Mission of Bay City$2,059
Corpus Christi Parish$2,000
New Beginnings Christian Church$2,000
All Saints Central High School$2,000
Bangor Central Elementary School$2,000
Our Lady of Peace Catholic Church$2,000
Resurrection of the Lord Parish$1,500
St Stanislaus Church$1,500
ARC of Bay County$1,000
Individual grant recipient$615
Pullen Elementary School$500
McGuire PTO$500
Essexville-Hampton Public Schools$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%St Catherine of Siena Academy: $3k → 8%State Theatre: $2k → 14%All Saints Central High School: $3k → 14%Toys for Tots: $2k → 16%St Francis Center: $2k → 16%St Catherine of Siena Academy: $3k → 8%Bay Area Catholic Schools: $3k → 14%St Francis Center: $2k → 16%St Catherine of Sienna Academy: $3k → 8%Bay Area Catholic Schools: $2k → 14%St Francis Center: $2k → 16%St Catherine of Siena Academy: $3k → 8%All Saints Central High School: $2k → 14%St Francis Center: $2k → 16%St Francis Center: $2k → 16%Catholic Diocese of Saginaw: $9k → 18%New Beginnings Christian Church: $7k → 18%Brian's House Community Group: $2k → 14%New Beginnings Christian Church: $6k → 18%New Beginnings Christian Church: $4k → 18%New Beginnings Christian Church: $2k → 18%New Beginnings Christian Church: $2k → 18%Camp Fish Tales: $22k → 14%Camp Fish Tales: $7k → 14%Camp Fish Tales: $5k → 14%Camp Fish Tales: $5k → 14%Camp Fish Tales: $5k → 14%Camp Fish Tales: $5k → 14%Camp Fish Tales: $5k → 14%Camp Fish Tales: $5k → 14%Corpus Christi Parish: $6k → 14%Corpus Christi Parish: $5k → 14%Our Lady of Peace Catholic Church: $5k → 14%Our Lady of Peace Catholic Church: $5k → 14%Our Lady of Peace Catholic Church: $5k → 14%Corpus Christi Parish: $5k → 14%Our Lady of Peace Catholic Church: $5k → 14%Corpus Christi Parish: $5k → 14%Bay Area Women's Center: $3k → 14%Midland Street Merchants Association: $3k → 14%Bay Area Women's Center: $3k → 14%Midland Street Merchants Association: $3k → 14%Corpus Christi Parish: $2k → 14%Bay Area Women's Center: $2k → 14%Corpus Christi Parish: $2k → 14%Bay Area Women's Center: $2k → 14%Bay Area Women's Center: $2k → 14%St Mary of the Assumption: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$244k · 24 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
11

Total granted

$244k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
0%

Still filing today

29%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsPhilanthropyReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FISH TALES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +150%
  • BA
    BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER
    6× · 2018–2023 · $13k · revenue +69%
  • BH
    BRIAN'S HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • EG
    EWTN Global Catholic Network
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • XD
    XAVIER DEGROAT AUTISM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay Shore Services Inc

Our goal is to encourage full-citizenship and personal growth for all people, especially those with disabilities who live in the nine county area that comprises the eastern shore of maryland.

—
2
Bay Human Services

To provide specialized residential services to mentally ill and disabled individuals in order to assist each person to meet personal goals by providing the highest quality services that are unique to each person's wishes, needs, and…

Human Services
3
Bay Home Inc

Care of developmentally disabled adults.

Philanthropy
4
Bayside Community Network Inc

Bayside community network, inc. provides rehabilitative care, room and board, and vocational training to individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
5
Brian House Inc

To provide residential community based supports to individuals with developmental challenges.

—
6
Association for Adults With Developmental Disabilities Inc

Aiding the developmentally disabled.

—
7
Brian's House Inc

Brian's House specializes in the care and treatment of people with disabilities. Brian's House provides a broad range of human services to people with special needs and challenges. The primary goal is to maximize each individual's…

Human Services
8
Susan Mast Als Foundation

The mission of the susan mast als foundation is to provide excellent support to als patients, families and caregivers living in west michigan. our services focus on all areas of need for the regional als community.

—
9
The Arc of Columbia County-Portage

The arc of columbia county shall exist to work for the well-being of all persons with developmental and related disabilities, regardless of race, creed or color, by promoting quality of life through the advocacy for education of people…

Human Services
10
Living With Autism Inc

To enrich the lives of adults with autism and developmental disabilities

Health
11
The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association St Louis Regional Chapter

To discover treatments and a cure for als, and to serve, advocate for, and empower people affected by als to live their lives to the fullest.

—
12
The Humane Society of Dorchester County Inc

Baywater animal rescue is a no-kill shelter dedicated to improving the lives of people and pets

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bay Area Women's Center; the most unlike its peers is Xavier Degroat Autism Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FISH TALES: $60,500 · OtherFISH TALESCorpus Christi Parish: $28,805 · OtherCorpus Christi ParishOur Lady of Peace Catholic Church: $25,100 · OtherOur Lady of Peace Catholic ChurchNew Beginnings Christian Church: $22,475 · OtherNew Beginnings Christian ChurchST CATHERINE OF SIENA ACADEMY: $14,000 · OtherST CATHERINE OF SIENA ACADEMYBAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $13,205 · OtherBAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTERSt Francis Center: $12,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SAGINAW: $9,761 · Other+26 more: $54,599 · Other+26 moreBRIAN'S HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP INC: $5,775 · PhilanthropyMIDLAND STREET MERCHANTS: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthXAVIER DEGROAT AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,000 · HealthSAGINAW VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,250 · AnimalsCHOSEN VISION INC: $100 · Religion
Other$240,445Philanthropy$5,775Arts & Culture$5,000Health$3,500Animals$1,250Religion$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFISH TALES: $60,500 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $13,205 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBRIAN'S HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP INC: $5,775 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMIDLAND STREET MERCHANTS: $5,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetBAY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAGINAW VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF BAY COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetXAVIER DEGROAT AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOSEN VISION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FISH TALES ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRIAN'S HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND STREET MERCHANTS ↗
  • Who funds BAY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAGINAW VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF BAY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER DEGROAT AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds CHOSEN VISION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bay Area Community FoundationMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bay Area Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thelen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thelen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thelen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph