Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tesuque Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$265k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.4MHealth$978kFood & Nutrition$490kEducation$75kHousing & Shelter$55kHuman Services$45kAnimals$25kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRIMARY INFORMATION INC$100,000
LIGHT INDUSTRY CINEMA PROJECTS LIMITED$100,000
MUSIC FOR FOOD INC$50,000
SYMPHONIC JAZZ ORCHESTRA$10,000
NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$5,209
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $15k → 7%CELL DOGS: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 7 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
22

Total granted

$2.0M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
0%

Still filing today

71%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EMERGENT ART SPACE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $350k · revenue +8% · 66% of their budget
  • SJ
    SYMPHONIC JAZZ ORCHESTRA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +48%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR NEW MUSIC SAN FRANCISCO INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $350k
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    one grant, 2019 · $320k · revenue -17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $206k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
3
Art for Resistance Through Change

Raise awareness of social justice

Arts & Culture
4
Kearny Street Workshop Incorporated

Ksw makes artists out of community members and community members out of artists. since 1972, ksw has nurtured the creative spirit, and offered an important platform for new voices to be heard -full statement on schedule o

Arts & Culture
5
Voices of Silicon Valley

Community Music / Arts Organization

Arts & Culture
6
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
7
Art of Opera a Foundation

Art of Opera is dedicated to creating opera, music theater and multimedia based projects, commissioning composers to compose and arrange music for small chamber concerts and supporting the release of recordings.

Arts & Culture
8
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
9
San Francisco Art Studio Foundation
—
10
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
11
Artronika

ARTRONIKA is a collective of Los Angeles based artists that produce immersive arts programming showcasing an array of South Asian talent and culture. Through innovative and inclusive events, we reimagine traditional music, art, and…

—
12
Art Start Inc

Art start uses the creative process to nurture the voices, hearts and minds - see schedule o

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for New Music San Francisco Inc; the most unlike its peers is Climate Rights International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOMELESS PRENATAL CARE: $970,000 · OtherHOMELESS PRENATAL CAREIndividual grant recipient: $350,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMUSIC FOR FOOD: $350,000 · OtherMUSIC FOR FOODIndividual grant recipient: $206,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $206,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMUSIC FOR FOOD INC: $100,000 · OtherLIGHT INDUSTRY CINEMA PROJECTS LIMITED: $100,000 · Other+12 more: $215,906 · Other+12 moreEMERGENT ART SPACE: $350,000 · Arts & CultureEMERGENT ART SPACESAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $320,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODER…PRIMARY INFORMATION INC: $100,000 · Arts & CulturePRIMARY INFORMATION INCSYMPHONIC JAZZ ORCHESTRA: $82,500 · Arts & CultureSYMPHONIC JAZZ ORCHESTRACENTER FOR NEW MUSIC SAN FRANCISCO INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR NEW MUSIC SAN FRAN…+1 more: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $75,000 · EducationPATH VENTURES: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $15,000 · Human ServicesCELL DOGS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $5,209 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESCUE CENTER: $15,000 · ReligionClimate Rights International: $12,500 · Environment
Other$2,498,406Arts & Culture$932,500Education$75,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Human Services$30,209Religion$15,000Environment$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMERGENT ART SPACE: $350,000 over 7y, 66% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $320,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRIMARY INFORMATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMUSIC FOR FOOD INC: $100,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetSYMPHONIC JAZZ ORCHESTRA: $82,500 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetPATH VENTURES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOUND ART INC DBA IN THE BAND: $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetFAMILY RESCUE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetEACH ONE REACH ONE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetClimate Rights International: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCELL DOGS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMERGENT ART SPACE ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds PRIMARY INFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC FOR FOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds SYMPHONIC JAZZ ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR NEW MUSIC SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
  • Who funds PATH VENTURES ↗
  • Who funds SOUND ART INC DBA IN THE BAND ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESCUE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EACH ONE REACH ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds Climate Rights International ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CELL DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tesuque Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tesuque Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tesuque’s filings →

    More from the funding graph