Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ted & Joyce Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$155k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$292kRecreation & Sports$221kInternational$162kHealth$81kHuman Services$53kEnvironment$50kEmployment$42kYouth Development$42kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $141k
$17,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
Nazareth Evangelical College$25,000
Hope International$25,000
Untold$22,000
Individual grant recipient$17,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Samaritans Purse$10,000
Talita Cumi$7,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Ethos 360$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Talita Cumi: $7k → 9%Evangel Home: $25k → 19%Evangel Home: $7k → 19%Evangel Home: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of The Ted & Joyce Smith Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 33%.

The Ted & Joyce Smith Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 17% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$693k · 11 repeat orgs$336k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
20

Total granted

$693k
$260k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+6%

Still filing today

64%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2018–2024 · $61k · revenue +163%
  • UI
    Untold Inc
    2× · 2022–2024 · $42k · revenue +14%
  • H
    HOPE58
    2× · 2020–2021 · $42k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • T
    TEAM
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • SP
    SEARCH PARTY
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · 35% of their budget
  • PC
    Pregnacy Care Center
    one grant, 2018 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
2
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
5
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
E3 Partners Ministry

e3 Partners Ministry (e3) endeavors to equip believers worldwide with tools and training designed to help evangelize their communities in order to establish thriving churches.

Religion
8
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

—
9
Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services
10
A Jesus Mission

A Jesus Mission creates unique opportunities for individuals or teams to serves as Christian missionaires around the world through traditional evangelism, discipleship training, and outreach.

Religion
11
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
12
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Fellowship of Evangelical Students Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is HOPE58. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUME LAKE CHRISTIAN CAMPS INC: $210,500 · OtherHUME LAKE CHRISTIAN CAMPS INCIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $62,500 · OtherAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATEDTEAM: $50,000 · OtherTEAMPregnacy Care Center: $39,000 · OtherPregnacy Care CenterIndividual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherNazareth Evangelical College: $25,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $20,000 · OtherHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · Other+13 more: $57,000 · Other+13 moreINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL STUDENTS USA INC: $102,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSH…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $61,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEElam Ministries: $13,000 · ReligionElam MinistriesAlongside Inc: $11,000 · ReligionAlongside IncFriends of the Great Commission: $10,000 · Religion+2 more: $6,500 · ReligionHOPE58: $42,000 · EducationSINAPIS GROUP INC: $20,000 · EducationSEARCH PARTY: $45,000 · Community ImprovementUntold Inc: $42,000 · HealthEVANGEL HOME INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesTALITA CUMI: $7,000 · Human ServicesFresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentChild Evangelism Fellowship Of Southern California Inc: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$596,000Religion$203,500Education$62,000Community Improvement$45,000Health$42,000Human Services$40,000Youth Development$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL STUDENTS USA INC: $102,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $61,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEARCH PARTY: $45,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetUntold Inc: $42,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE58: $42,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetEVANGEL HOME INC: $33,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSINAPIS GROUP INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetElam Ministries: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlongside Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFriends of the Great Commission: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChild Evangelism Fellowship Of Southern California Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTALITA CUMI: $7,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEMPOWERING LIVES INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL STUDENTS USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH PARTY ↗
  • Who funds Untold Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE58 ↗
  • Who funds EVANGEL HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds FresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SINAPIS GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Alongside Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Great Commission ↗
  • Who funds Child Evangelism Fellowship Of Southern California Inc ↗
  • Who funds TALITA CUMI ↗
  • Who funds LEADS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWERING LIVES INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO27.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · First Fruit Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ted & Joyce Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ted & Joyce Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ted & Joyce Smith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph