Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ted and Jillyn Verdon Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$60kReligion$59kEducation$30kHousing & Shelter$18kHealth$17kArts & Culture$16kInternational$15kYouth Development$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$767k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DISCOVERY CUBE$10,300
WYLAND FOUNDATION$10,200
LOURDES FOUNDATION$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
ORANGE COUNTY RESCUE MISSION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WISE PLACE: $1k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$240k · 11 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$240k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+59%

Still filing today

55%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LOURDES FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +39%
  • OC
    Orange County Rescue Mission Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $17k · revenue +5%
  • DS
    DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY
    3× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • GI
    GIRLS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF OC
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • JR
    Jessie Rees Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
4
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
5
Our Children Have Rightsorg Inc

The corporation's mission is to protect the rights of children to have access to their parents by providing education, resources, and support services for successful co-parenting strategies.

Human Services
6
Onelegacy

Onelegacy saves and heals lives through organ, eye and tissue donation, comforts the families we serve, and inspires our communities to donate life.

Health
7
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
8
Rady Children's Health

Rady children's health (formerly rady children's hospital and health center (rchhc)) was formed to acquire, establish, maintain, conduct, operate, raise funds for, and otherwise support, directly or indirectly through its affiliates,…

Health
9
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
10
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
Orange Twins Rescue
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of California Irvine Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WYLAND FOUNDATION: $59,550 · OtherWYLAND FOUNDATIONMISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $41,000 · OtherMISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANOIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS: $18,000 · OtherOUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELSGIRLS INC: $7,000 · Other+5 more: $17,600 · Other+5 moreLOURDES FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · EducationLOURDES FOUNDATION…Direct Connections To Africa: $15,000 · EducationDirect Connections…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALI…Orange County Rescue Mission Inc: $17,000 · Housing & ShelterVETERANS LEGAL INSTITUTE: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterDISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $15,800 · Arts & CultureJessie Rees Foundation: $4,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $4,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $8,000 · AnimalsCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $3,000 · ReligionWISEPLACE: $1,000 · Human ServicesHuman Options Inc: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$176,150Education$45,000Housing & Shelter$19,500Arts & Culture$15,800Health$11,000Animals$8,000Religion$3,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWYLAND FOUNDATION: $59,550 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetLOURDES FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $15,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDirect Connections To Africa: $15,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJessie Rees Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS LEGAL INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISEPLACE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Options Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WYLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOURDES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Direct Connections To Africa ↗
  • Who funds RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Jessie Rees Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS LEGAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds WISEPLACE ↗
  • Who funds Human Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hoag Memorial Hospital PresbyterianCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · O L Halsell Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ted and Jillyn Verdon Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ted and Jillyn Verdon Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ted and Jillyn Verdon Private Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ted and Jillyn Verdon Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ted and Jillyn Verdon Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph