Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Teammates for Kids Foundation

In partnership with professional athletes, corporations, foundations, celebrities and individual teammates, we help children in the areas of health, education and inner city.

$1.8M
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
10
States reached
$662k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$4.9MHuman Services$2.5MYouth Development$2.0MRecreation & Sports$1.8MEducation$1.3MPhilanthropy$573kInternational$519kReligion$164kOther$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $363k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$30,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$93M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$661,506
Individual grant recipient$384,407
PASTIME YOUTH ACADEMIES$251,000
VERTICAL LLC$104,223
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION$80,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$73,845
JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$55,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$50,000
COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION -CHILD LIFE DEPT$30,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND$25,000
OKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$22,154
A ONE STOP PRINT SHOP$13,187
PROHOLDINGS$11,509
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - CHILD LIFE DEPT$8,629
SANTA ROSA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$7,980
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOE'S PLACE CORPORATION: $30k → 11%CARE TO LEARN: $25k → 15%BLUES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $14k → 21%CHICAGO WHITE SOX CHARITIES: $15k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC: $25k → 16%BIG LEAGUE IMPACT: $25k → 12%KIDS VOICE OF INDIANA INC: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.2M · 42 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 32 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
74

Total granted

$9.2M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+52%

Still filing today

74%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $738k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +2% · 98% of their budget
  • CC
    Cook Children's Medical Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $469k · revenue +118%
  • CC
    CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $409k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • ML
    Major League Baseball Charities Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $890k · revenue -10%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY URBAN YOUTH ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $123k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Giants Community Fund

The giants community fund (the "fund") uses baseball and softball to promote health, education, and character development to propel youth in underserved regions to be positive forces in their communities. the fund, a 501(c)(3) public…

Philanthropy
2
Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation
Recreation & Sports
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
5
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
6
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
7
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Major League Baseball Players Trust

The major league baseball players trust harnesses the expertise, influence, and energy of players to create meaningful and sustainable change in the lifelong well-being of others. this is achieved through a series of programs that are run…

Recreation & Sports
9
Arkansas Children's Foundation

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
10
Children's Hospital Foundation

See schedule ochildren's hospital foundation dba children's national hospital foundation supports world class care and research for the nation's children. children's national hospital foundation serves as the fundraising arm for children's…

Health
11
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
12
Charlotte Hornets Foundation Inc

Through the investment of time, talents, and treasure, the charlotte hornets foundation will support, promote, and enhance important community efforts that enrich the quality of life for those in need, especially children and youth…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Astros Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Sports Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/114
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,451

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/102
Grantees still filing
78/102
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,880,195 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAGLE ALLIANCE CHURCH OF THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE — $534,333 · OtherEAGLE ALLIANCE CHURCH OF THE CHRISTIAN AND M…PROCAMPS INC — $459,899 · OtherPROCAMPS INCMICROSOFT — $422,913 · OtherMICROSOFTKANSAS CITY URBAN YOUTH ACADEMY INC — $300,000 · OtherKANSAS CITY URBAN YOUTH ACADEMY INCVERTICAL LLC — $279,463 · Other+56 more — $1,667,358 · Other+56 moreCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA GROUP RETURN — $661,506 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF …Cook Children's Medical Center — $469,179 · HealthCook Children's Medical C…CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $408,936 · HealthCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUND…Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $364,173 · HealthChildren's Hospital Color…Texas Children's Hospital — $258,336 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $250,551 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER…JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $129,863 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $118,681 · Health+11 more — $481,710 · Health+11 moreMajor League Baseball Charities Inc — $890,000 · PhilanthropyMajor League Ba…James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association — $267,989 · PhilanthropyJames Whitcomb …THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $216,250 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CIN…ST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND — $122,750 · PhilanthropyST LOUIS CARDIN…NASHVILLE PREDATORS FOUNDATION — $94,000 · PhilanthropyColorado Rockies Baseball Club Foundation — $90,000 · Philanthropy+12 more — $297,217 · Philanthropy+12 morePASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC — $1,427,546 · Recreation & SportsPASTIME WITH…+8 more — $135,000 · Recreation & Sports+8 moreUCLA FOUNDATION — $966,176 · EducationUCLA FOUN…TEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION — $85,250 · EducationTEXAS RAN…+6 more — $82,068 · Education+6 moreHope for Haiti Childrens Center Inc — $274,401 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $244,333 · InternationalFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentILITCH CHARITIES INC — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentEAGLE U INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentWASHINGTON NATIONALS PHILANTHROPIES — $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentAnthony Munoz Foundation — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentMARINERS CARE — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION — $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,544,161Health$3,142,935Philanthropy$1,978,206Recreation & Sports$1,562,546Education$1,133,494International$518,734Youth Development$188,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPASTIME WITH PURPOSE INC — $1,427,546 over 7y, 98% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $966,176 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMajor League Baseball Charities Inc — $890,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA GROUP RETURN — $661,506 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center — $469,179 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $408,936 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $364,173 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHope for Haiti Childrens Center Inc — $274,401 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association — $267,989 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $258,336 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $250,551 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $244,333 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $216,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $129,863 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND — $122,750 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $118,681 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetArizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation — $95,924 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE PREDATORS FOUNDATION — $94,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $91,174 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL VOLUNTEERS — $90,847 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetColorado Rockies Baseball Club Foundation — $90,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $86,174 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION — $85,250 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetIndiana University Health Inc — $69,186 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRadical Inc — $67,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE KANSAS CITY ROYALS FOUNDATION — $54,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMONUMENTAL SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION — $52,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIFE IS GOOD PLAYMAKER PROJECT INC — $46,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $40,426 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILITCH CHARITIES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMIAMI MARLINS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetPIRATES CHARITIES — $30,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetChicago Cubs Charities — $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSHARE FOOD PROGRAM — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC — $29,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BALTIMORE ORIOLES FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTHE CINCINNATI REDS COMMUNITY FUND — $26,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Major League Baseball Charities IncNY49.5× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Major League Baseball Charities Inc · Fantasy Camps for Kids · Major League Baseball Players Trust · Jackson Yelle Family Foundation · Pitch in for Baseball and Softball · Big League Impact Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Texas Rangers Baseball Foundation · Nfl Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Teammates for Kids Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 33%
  • LOVE146 Inc49% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc33% of income from government
  • The Red Sox Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Teammates for Kids Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Teammates for Kids Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $3.8M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph