How much did THE TAYLOR FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of THE TAYLOR FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

boycamppolicecancerfayette pregnancyhopechristian

2019

boypediatriclibertychild welfarecancerchristianhope

2020

food bankchristianslibertyresearchchildchildhoodcancer

2021

policecamprockdeptveterans

2022

womencliniccampchildrenshope

2023

hearteducationveteranschildrens

2024

firefighterseducationfoodarmyveteranschildrens

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k45 grants · $115k
$10k–50k16 grants · $309k
$50k–250k6 grants · $769k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$9.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$246,052
DONOR ADVISED FUNDS$192,000
HORATIO ALGER ASSOCIATION$130,000
BENNETT CHARITY FUND$100,968
PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE FOUND$50,000
CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATL$50,000
COMMUNITY BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$48,000
INDEPENDENT WOMENS FORUM$25,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$25,000
MAYO CLINIC$25,000
REALIFE AT BLUE SPRINGS$20,896
JABBOK MINISTRIES$20,500
SAMARITANS PURSE$20,000
TRUCKSTOP MINISTRIES$20,000
UNBOUND NOW$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.4M · 108 repeat orgs$549k to everyone else

108 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 60 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108

173

Total granted

$4.4M

$428k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+49%

Still filing today

36%

32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WA
Wreaths Across America
7× · 2018–2024 · $698k · revenue +125%
CA
CAMP ANDERSON
2× · 2021–2022 · $119k · revenue +292%
MC
MAYO CLINIC
3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +29%

Funded once

NF
NAZARENE FUND
one grant, 2021 · $25k
CA
CAMP ANDERSONgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $23k · revenue +762% · 56% of their budget
LF
LEACHVILLE FIRE DEPT
one grant, 2021 · $18k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Courage Worldwide Inc

To provide homes and resources for children who have been recovered from sex trafficking worldwide so they begin their unique journey of healing and be a courageous leader in the global anti-trafficking movement.

Human Services

Hope Worldwide Ltd

Motivated by god's love, we partner with our neighbors in need, equip volunteers, respond to disasters and strenghten communities to inspire greater hope in our world.

International

His House Inc

His house children's home is a faith-based organization that restores the lives of children and families.

—

Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ-centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture

Angel House of Georgia Inc

Provide a rehabilitation center for women recovering from alcohol and drug addiction

Housing & Shelter

Christs Hope U S a Inc

Empowering orphaned and vulnerable children to break the cycles of extreme poverty, AIDS, and spiritual brokenness through family-based care and discipleship in Jesus Christ.

Human Services

Here to Serve Inc

We believe a child's cancer journey is life-altering for both the child and family. For that reason, the care and support of the family are required to avoid parent(s) from losing their health, home, job, and/or entering into bankruptcy.…

Human Services

Hesed Global Missions Inc

Rescuing girls and boys from trafficking providing them with basic necessities including shelter food education health care. Feeding and providing clothes to the homeless in Atlanta.

Arts & Culture

Georgia Center for Child Advocacy Inc

The Georgia center for child advocacy's mission is to champion the needs of sexually and severely physically abused children through prevention, intervention, therapy, and collaboration.

Human Services

She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future.

International

Miracles for Kids Inc

Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they can focus on fighting for their child's life.

Recreation & Sports

Covenant Care Services Inc

Covenant Care Services, Inc. is a non-profit faith-based adoption agency serving birthmothers and adoptive families in the state of Georgia.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Mayo Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/123

the rest of the field

16%

9,180/58,178

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

109 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

103/109

Grantees still filing

77/109

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,638,745Public Benefit$749,319Religion$224,525Health$174,300Human Services$109,950Education$58,910Community Improvement$26,230

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS25.3× affinity22 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater · William R & Sara Babb Smith · Ed and Claude Fortson Charitable Trust · Renasant Community Foundation · Paradise Empowers Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation · Community Foundation for Northeast · Speedway Children's Charities

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE TAYLOR FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CAMP ANDERSON.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 8.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 352490766 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CAMP ANDERSON, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 56% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Taylor Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Taylor Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE TAYLOR FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

109 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Taylor Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE TAYLOR FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

109 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Taylor Foundation?

More from the funding graph