Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William R & Sara Babb Smith Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$222k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of WILLIAM R & SARA BABB SMITH FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $210k
$22,756
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A FRIEND'S HOUSE$45,000
THE FOOD PANTRY$40,000
HANDS OF HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$22,756
JOSEPH SAMS SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THE BRIDGE WELLNESS SOUTH$12,000
CROSSWALK$8,000
FERST READERS OF HENRY CO$4,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $269k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A FRIEND'S HOUSE: $45k → 8%A FRIEND'S HOUSE: $40k → 8%A FRIEND'S HOUSE: $30k → 8%A FRIEND'S HOUSE INC: $30k → 8%A FRIEND'S HOUSE: $30k → 8%A FRIEND'S HOUSE: $30k → 8%A FRIEND'S HOUSE INC: $25k → 8%CONNECTING HENRY: $20k → 8%CONNECTING HENRY INC: $19k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 17 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
17

Total granted

$1.2M
$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+23%

Still filing today

35%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    A FRIENDS HOUSE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $230k · revenue +185%
  • TJ
    THE JOSEPH SAMS SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +0%
  • HC
    HENRY COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2021 · $50k · revenue +60% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -33%
  • FC
    FLINT CIRCUIT COUNCIL ON FAMILY VIOLENCE INC DBA HAVEN HOUSE
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +23%
  • HO
    HANDS OF HOPE
    one grant, 2019 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Henry County Hospital Inc

Please see schedule o for the organization's mission statement.

Health
2
Henry County Hospital Foundation Inc

To raise funds and provide financial assistance to henry county hospital, inc. all funds raised are to be used for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and to carry out the purpose of the hospital in providing health care to the…

Health
3
Hammond-Henry Hospital Foundation

To assist in meeting the healthcare needs of the community.

Health
4
Johns Hopkins Medical Services Corporation

Johns hopkins medical services corporation provides healthcare services to the population of the us family health plan (usfhp).

Health
5
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

6
Kids Home Care Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, and to provide pediatric home health care, alternate site and other pediatric services to pediatric patients. in addition, kids home care conducts health…

Health
7
Hamilton Health Center Community Services Inc

Hhcs has undertaken two major kinds of activities in support of hamilton health center. hhccs acquired and completed the rehabilitation of a major facility in the city of harrisburg. hhccs owns, and is responsible for, facility management…

Health
8
Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc

The mission of family health center of marshfield, inc. is to provide access to high quality health care services for the underserved and to enhance the health of our communities.

Health
9
Henry County Youth Services Bureau

The mission of the henry county youth services bureau services bureau is to provide counseling to troubled youth in henry county, so the youth can become responsible for their own actions and can be able to function in a socially…

10
Johns Hopkins Home Health Services Inc

Provision of home health services including community outreach programs with an emphasis on detection and prevention of common illnesses and disease.

Health
11
Floyd Healthcare Resources Inc

Healthcare related services

Health
12
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge Wellness South Corporation and the most unlike its peers is The Bedford School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FOOD PANTRY — $320,000 · OtherTHE FOOD PANTRYIndividual grant recipient — $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHANDS OF HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC — $90,000 · OtherHANDS OF HOPE MEDICAL CLINICHAVEN HOUSE — $45,000 · Other+24 more — $299,656 · Other+24 moreA FRIENDS HOUSE INC — $230,000 · Human ServicesA FRIENDS HOUSE INCCONNECTING HENRY INC — $38,660 · Human ServicesCONNECTING HENRY INCTHE JOSEPH SAMS SCHOOL INC — $160,000 · EducationTHE JOSEPH SAMS SC…HENRY COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationHENRY COUNTY SCHOL…THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $37,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF …HANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC — $40,000 · HealthHENRY COUNTY CANCER SERVICES INC — $30,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $20,000 · HealthTHE BRIDGE WELLNESS SOUTH CORPORATION — $12,000 · Health
Other$859,656Human Services$268,660Education$247,500Health$102,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetA FRIENDS HOUSE INC — $230,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetTHE JOSEPH SAMS SCHOOL INC — $160,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetHENRY COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetHANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC — $40,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCONNECTING HENRY INC — $38,660 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY COUNTY CANCER SERVICES INC — $30,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLINT CIRCUIT COUNCIL ON FAMILY VIOLENCE INC DBA HAVEN HOUSE — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE BRIDGE WELLNESS SOUTH CORPORATION — $12,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetThe Bedford School Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A FRIENDS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE JOSEPH SAMS SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds HENRY COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC
  • Who funds CONNECTING HENRY INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HENRY COUNTY CANCER SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds FLINT CIRCUIT COUNCIL ON FAMILY VIOLENCE INC DBA HAVEN HOUSE
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE WELLNESS SOUTH CORPORATION
  • Who funds The Bedford School Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Taylor FoundationGA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Taylor Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Ed and Claude Fortson Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Servant Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William R & Sara Babb Smith Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William R & Sara Babb Smith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William R & Sara Babb Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph