· Private foundation
The Tate Family Charitable Trust Attn Trent Tate
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bridge Ada County co Treasure Valley YMCA | $12,000 |
| The College of Idaho | $10,000 |
| Terry Reilly Health Services | $5,000 |
| Boise Public Schools Education Foundation | $5,000 |
| Idaho Foodbank | $5,000 |
| Interfaith Sanctuary | $5,000 |
| Chrysalis Womens Transitional Living | $3,000 |
| Life's Kitchen | $3,000 |
| Josephy Center for Arts | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Wallowa Valley Music Alliance | $2,000 |
| Owl Research Institute | $2,000 |
| The Nature Conservancy in Idaho | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCThe College of Idaho Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +66%
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC8× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +161%
- IFIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE7× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- BABridge Ada County in care of Treasre Valley YMCAone grant, 2024 · $8k
- LVLILLIAN VALLELY SCHOOL INCone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -124%
- TOTIP of the Treasure Valleyone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
To stop, prevent, and heal the effects of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and dating violence in lemhi and custer counties.
Recovery Idaho offers peer-based recovery support services to help prevent relapse and sustain long-term recovery by building recovery capital, demonstrating hope, inviting all to participate, promoting volunteerism, and creating public…
Our mission is to put private and public resources into action statewide to eliminate hunger and provide food security for all idahoans.
The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.
Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education
To meet the needs of individuals in crisis with a welcoming, hopeful & safe environment and to help the individual achieve stability and develop a vision for recovery. to create a supportive environment in north idaho in which people can…
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifes Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Joseph Branch Trail Consortium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds BOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WALLOWA VALLEY MUSIC ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
- Who funds LIFES KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHRYSALIS WOMENS TRANSITIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MCCALL WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Trauma Intervention Programs Inc ↗
- Who funds The Momentum Group Create Common Good ↗
- Who funds JOSEPH BRANCH TRAIL CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds OWL RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Josephy Center for Arts and Culture ↗
- Who funds CATCH INC ↗
- Who funds LILLIAN VALLELY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds TRAUMA INTERVENTION PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
- Who funds GIRAFFE LAUGH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · The Bews Foundation · United Way of Treasure Valley Inc · El& Bg Lightfoot Foundation · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Tate Family Charitable Trust Attn Trent Tate funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Joseph Branch Trail Consortium — 34% of income from government
- Josephy Center for Arts and Culture — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Tate Family Charitable Trust Attn Trent Tate?
Find your warmest path to The Tate Family Charitable Trust Attn Trent Tate through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.