Skip to content
The Tartell Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Tartell Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$97kHealth$81kReligion$68kCivil Rights$57kArts & Culture$47kHousing & Shelter$40kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DOROT: $1k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$448k · 28 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
45

Total granted

$448k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+60%

Still filing today

39%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’24
InternationalHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $46k · revenue +21%
  • AB
    APPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION INSTIT
    4× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +55%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • JF
    Jewish Fund For Camp Massai
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • H
    HHREC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SC
    Sheriliner Choir Of LI
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
3
Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

The auschwitz institute for the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities is dedicated to building a world that prevents genocide. we aim to see every state effectively integrate within government the domestically developed function of…

International
4
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
The American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…

International
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
12
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Manitoba Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
22/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Planned Parenhood of Nassau: $67,300 · OtherPlanned Parenhood of NassauYivo: $27,000 · OtherYivoUnited Jewish Appeal: $25,625 · OtherUnited Jewish AppealACLU: $20,500 · OtherACLUORT: $17,600 · OtherORTIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherLEAGUE FOR YIDDISH INC: $14,100 · OtherMalverne Jewish Center: $12,176 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+54 more: $78,778 · Other+54 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $46,050 · InternationalSave The Children Fed…International Rescue Committee INC: $30,100 · InternationalInternational Rescue …HIAS INC: $19,000 · InternationalHIAS INC+1 more: $1,600 · InternationalAPPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION INSTIT: $40,000 · HealthAPPLIED BE…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $7,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…+1 more: $100 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $35,025 · Crime & LegalYONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $11,000 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $9,260 · EnvironmentDOROT INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$298,279International$96,750Health$47,100Crime & Legal$35,025Education$11,100Environment$9,260Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $46,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAPPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION INSTIT: $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $35,025 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $30,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE FOR YIDDISH INC: $14,100 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetYONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $9,260 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $2,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MANITOBA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNassau County Museum of Art: $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds APPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION INSTIT ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE FOR YIDDISH INC ↗
  • Who funds YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE MANITOBA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJpmorgan Chase Founda…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tartell Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tartell Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Applied Behavioral Rehabilitation Instit: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tartell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home