Loading…
· Public charity
THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER
THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER (tahirih) is a national, nonprofit organization that serves women, girls, and all survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, forced marriage, and other forms of gender-based violence.
$669k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
4
Communities
$119k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Crime & Legal$1.5MHuman Services$645kHousing & Shelter$283kInternational$191kCommunity Improvement$155kOther$455k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
under dojmental health
2019
under federal
2020
under federal
2021
under federal
2022
under federal
2023
under federal
2024
under federal
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $491k
$100,648
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
- ASIAN WOMEN'S SHELTER$118,906
- LEGAL AID ATLANTA$106,278
- LEGAL SERVICE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA$100,648
- NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES$82,570
- COOPERATIVE RESTRAINING ORDER CLINIC$82,414
- AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$46,354
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $346k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 12 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
1
Total granted
$3.3M
$8k
Still filing today
92%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA8× · 2017–2024 · $956k · revenue +49%- NVNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES7× · 2018–2024 · $487k · revenue +18%
- DSDOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICE3× · 2019–2021 · $283k · revenue +185%
Funded once
- LOLAW OFFICE OF ADAM N CRANDALLone grant, 2017 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Legal Services Corporation
To promote equal access to justice in our nation and to provide high quality civil legal assistance to low-income individuals and families.
Crime & Legal
2
Virginia Legal Aid Society Inc
Virginia Legal Aid Society, Inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide legal assistance in non-criminal proceedings or matters to persons financially unable to afford legal assistance.
Crime & Legal
3
Legal Assistance to the Elderly
LAE's mission is to protect and advance the right of San Franciscos seniors and adults with disabilities to be housed, healthy, financially stable, and safe. We provide free legal services to San Francisco seniors and adults with…
Crime & Legal
4
Legal Aid Society of Eastern Virginia
Legal aid society of eastern virginia provides non-criminal legal assistance to the indigent.
Crime & Legal
5
Legal Aid Service of Northeastern
Our mission is to provide civil legal service to low-income clients. our legal services provide basic protection for our clients by enforcing the law when their rights have been violated, promote the self-sufficiency of individuals…
Crime & Legal
6
Family Violence Law Center
Family Violence Law Center ("FVLC") helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention…
Crime & Legal
7
Legal Aid Society
Legal representation for all victims of domestic violence and family law cases for low-income.
Crime & Legal
8
Legal Services Alabama Inc
Legal services alabama is a statewide nonprofit dedicated to providing access to justice and quality civil legal assistance to educate and empower alabama's low-income community.
Crime & Legal
9
Legal Aid of Western Ohio Inc
Legal aid of western ohio, inc. (lawo) is a non-profit law firm that provides high quality legal assistance in civil matters to help eligible low-income individuals and groups to achieve self-reliance, and equal justice and economic…
Crime & Legal
10
Volunteer Legal Advocates
To provide high-quality, free legal services to vulnerable low-income individuals in dc and md.
Housing & Shelter
11
Legal Aid of West Virginia Inc
To advocate for low-income vulnerable west virginians, seek equal access to justice, and create system change in order to improve client safety, health, housing, income and access to resources.
Crime & Legal
12
Southwest Va Legal Aid Society Inc
To champion equal justice for low-income virginians and to work to remedy the conditions that burden the low-income community. to these ends we strive to provide high-quality, courteous, and effective legal services.
Crime & Legal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legal Aid Bureau Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northern Virginia Family Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Crime & Legal$1,542,929Human Services$644,919Other$454,580Housing & Shelter$282,767International$190,842Community Improvement$154,812
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID ATLANTA ↗
- Who funds LONE STAR LEGAL AID ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE RESTRAINING ORDER CLINIC ↗
- Who funds ASYLEE WOMEN ENTERPRISE ↗
- Who funds ASIAN WOMEN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP AS FISCAL AGENT FOR INTERCULTURAL COUNSELING CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND LEGAL AID BUREAU INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Equal Justice WorksDC15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Equal Justice Works · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Asylee Women Enterprise Inc — 26% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Legal Aid Bureau Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ASYLEE WOMEN ENTERPRISE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 453769025 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ASYLEE WOMEN ENTERPRISE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Tahirih Justice Center?
Find your warmest path to The Tahirih Justice Center through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines