Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Synopsys Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$12MScience & Tech$9.4MInternational$3.0MEducation$718kRecreation & Sports$665kYouth Development$583kHealth$350kEnvironment$206kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $294k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.0M
$25,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SYNOPSYS SILICON VALLEY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY OUTRE$1,451,173
POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION$651,400
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC$500,000
MYRIAD USA INC$400,000
THE UK ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$200,000
TECHNOVATION$150,000
CITY YEAR INC$125,000
CITY YEAR INC$125,000
GIVE2ASIA$125,000
AGASTYA USA$101,761
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$50,000
LOTUS PETAL USA$50,000
FUNDACION PARA LA INCLUSION TECNOLOGICA KODEA$50,000
NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCA$50,000
POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION$42,850
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PARIKRMA USA INC: $17k → 19%PARIKRMA USA INC: $15k → 19%PARIKRMA USA INC: $15k → 19%K TO COLLEGE DBA SUPPLYBANKORG: $24k → 10%HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $15k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $120k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
OR
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 41% of The Synopsys Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Synopsys Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 30 repeat orgs$287k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
8

Total granted

$16M
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+25%

Still filing today

77%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +1%
  • T
    TECHNOVATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $375k · revenue +78%
  • NA
    NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $120k · revenue +25%
  • NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +19%
  • UI
    UPCHIEVE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Effective Ventures Foundation Usa Inc

Effective alturism is a growing social movement founded in the desire to make the world as good a place as it can be, the use of evidence and reason to find out how to do so, and the audacity to actually try.

Education
2
Future 500

See attached statementprimary missionfuture 500 builds trust between corporations, advocates, investors, and philanthropists to advance business as a force for good. we are experts in stakeholder engagement with over 25 years of experience…

3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
UniversalGiving

Our mission is to connect people to quality giving and volunteer opportunities worldwide. universalgiving is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, whose vision is to create a world where giving and volunteering are a natural part of everyday…

Philanthropy
7
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
8
Global Greengrants Fund

Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…

Environment
9
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
10
Ja Africa

The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.

Education
11
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
12
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc and the most unlike its peers is Love of Vietnam Expressed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Women & Girls Leadership De…School District FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Elementary Literacy TutoringChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development ServicesCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%28%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%50%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,938

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
23/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Synopsys SV Science Tech Outreach F — $5,407,711 · OtherSynopsys SV Science Tech Outreach FSYNOPSYS SILICON VALLEY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY OUTRE — $3,732,685 · OtherSYNOPSYS SILICON VALLEY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY OUTREUK Online Giving Foundation — $2,370,000 · OtherUK Online Giving FoundationKing Baudouin Foundation United Sta — $564,500 · Other+10 more — $783,891 · Other+10 moreAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $6,615,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INCSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $2,385,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community FoundationPOINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION — $1,660,742 · PhilanthropyPOINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATIONAGASTYA USA — $384,745 · Philanthropy+4 more — $66,864 · PhilanthropyGIVE2ASIA — $1,691,000 · InternationalGIVE2ASIAMYRIAD USA INC — $750,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA…+5 more — $53,346 · InternationalTECHNOVATION — $375,000 · Science & TechAUSTIN SCIENCE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Science & TechLOTUS PETAL USA — $102,375 · EducationSMART READING — $65,000 · EducationCAREERVILLAGE INC — $60,000 · EducationHillsboro Schools Foundation — $50,000 · EducationBEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $45,000 · EducationUPCHIEVE INC — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $9,944 · EducationSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $120,000 · Human ServicesPARIKRMA USA INC — $47,313 · Human ServicesHOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES — $45,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesK TO COLLEGE DBA SUPPLYBANKORG — $24,000 · Human ServicesNORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCA — $120,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $70,000 · EnvironmentFREE GEEK — $15,000 · Environment+1 more — $605 · Environment
Other$12,858,787Philanthropy$11,112,351International$2,494,346Science & Tech$445,000Education$357,319Human Services$261,313Environment$205,605

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $6,615,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $2,385,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE2ASIA — $1,691,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetPOINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION — $1,660,742 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $750,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAGASTYA USA — $384,745 over 3y, 32% of budgetTECHNOVATION — $375,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $350,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCA — $120,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $120,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLOTUS PETAL USA — $102,375 over 3y, 22% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN SCIENCE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetSMART READING — $65,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE — $62,440 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCAREERVILLAGE INC — $60,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHillsboro Schools Foundation — $50,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARIKRMA USA INC — $47,313 over 3y, 17% of budgetHOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES — $45,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPCHIEVE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetK TO COLLEGE DBA SUPPLYBANKORG — $24,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT INTERNATIONAL CHINA INC — $20,904 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMaison Chance USA Inc — $20,053 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetFREE GEEK — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHANDSON BAY AREA — $14,638 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOVE OF VIETNAM EXPRESSED — $12,186 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $10,414 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLDWIDE ORPHANS FOUNDATION — $9,944 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThrive Networks Global — $5,842 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPSGIVING FOUNDATION — $2,173 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trail Conservancy — $605 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA25.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Kla Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Oregon Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Synopsys Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Homeplate Youth Services17% of income from government
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • Free Geek5% of income from government
  • Smart Reading3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Synopsys Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Synopsys Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph