Skip to content
The Summit Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Summit Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
110
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$9.9MInternational$4.1MCivil Rights$1.6MPhilanthropy$1.4MYouth Development$1.4MHealth$1.0MCommunity Improvement$781kArts & Culture$458kOther$0
02FY2024 · 110 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k55 grants · $5.6M
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$50,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$159M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE$300,000
MESOAMERICAN REEF FUND$250,000
CORAL REEF ALLIANCE$245,000
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$225,000
HEALTHY REEFS FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE INC$200,000
ASOCIACION INTERAMERICANA PARA LA DEFENSA DEL AMBIENTE (AIDA)$175,000
OCEANA INC$175,000
HEALTHY REEFS FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE INC$151,300
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$150,000
FRIENDS OF TURNEFFE ATOLL DBA TURNEFFE ATOLL TRUST$150,000
SEATTLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$150,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$150,000
INNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES$150,000
GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP$150,000
SMART GROWTH AMERICA$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 70% of grant dollars ($15M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 30% that went abroad ($6.7M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $470k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SHE'S THE FIRST INC: $25k → 17%TEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI: $40k → 23%INICIATIVA GUATEMALA: $25k → 6%SHE'S THE FIRST INC: $25k → 17%TEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI: $40k → 23%INICIATIVA GUATEMALA: $25k → 6%INICIATIVA GUATEMALA: $20k → 6%CASA MYRNA: $3k → 16%INICIATIVA GUATEMALA: $19k → 6%CASA MYRNA: $3k → 16%TIDES CENTER: $127k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%PROMUNDO-US: $49k → 14%THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT TEEN AND UNPLANNED PREGNANCY DBA POWER TO: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
MS
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 30% of all-years giving ($6.7M)

9 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Guatemala$3.8M · 31 grants
Honduras$876k · 17 grants
Belize$805k · 11 grants
Canada$305k · 5 grants
Costa Rica$300k · 6 grants
Netherlands$275k · 4 grants
United Kingdom$200k · 5 grants
Spain$75k · 2 grants
Peru$74k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Summit Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 19% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 15%.

The Summit Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 43% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 90 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

90 repeat relationships: 70 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
32

Total granted

$19M
$928k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+17%

Still filing today

71%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK
    3× · 2020–2024 · $687k · revenue +71%
  • GP
    GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP
    3× · 2022–2024 · $613k · revenue +105%
  • TC
    THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $610k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • WW
    Women Win Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue -87%
  • Emerald Cities Collaborative Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $95k · revenue +54%
  • R
    RAREgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
4
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
7
Global Greengrants Fund

Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…

Environment
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
10
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
11
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
12
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Greater Himalayas Foundation Honoring the Legacy of of Mingma. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
103/104
Grantees still filing
55/104
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MESOAMERICAN REEF FUND: $1,878,154 · OtherMESOAMERICAN REEF FUNDFUNDACION PARA EL ECODESARROLLO Y LA CONSERVACION: $1,200,000 · OtherFUNDACION PARA EL ECODESARROLLO Y LA CONSERVACIONENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE: $600,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDETOLEDO INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT: $448,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $369,000 · Other+70 more: $5,788,357 · Other+70 moreOCEANA INC: $707,400 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCURBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK: $686,520 · EnvironmentURBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECT…THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE: $610,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCESMART GROWTH AMERICA: $545,000 · EnvironmentSMART GROWTH AMERICAHealthy Reefs For Healthy People Inc: $351,300 · EnvironmentHealthy Reefs For Healthy P…Environmental Law Institute: $330,000 · EnvironmentEnvironmental Law InstituteWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $304,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $200,000 · EnvironmentMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC: $200,000 · Environment+18 more: $1,373,047 · Environment+18 moreGLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP: $613,400 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL PHI…INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $594,100 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIO…SEATTLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $572,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE IN…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $125,334 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLE…ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $42,900 · PhilanthropyTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $465,000 · InternationalTHE POPUL…INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $450,000 · InternationalINTERNATI…Girl Rising: $385,000 · InternationalGirl Risi…PANORAMA GLOBAL: $225,000 · InternationalPANORAMA …Women Win Foundation Inc: $120,000 · InternationalWomen Win…MAIA: $95,000 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $75,000 · International+6 more: $72,680 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $655,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $328,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNEWS NETWORK: $105,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureINNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $300,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $112,500 · Community ImprovementREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE: $100,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CITY TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementGreater Greater Washington Commons: $90,000 · Community ImprovementTRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION: $33,239 · Community ImprovementTIDES CENTER: $337,000 · Human ServicesIniciativa Guatemala: $88,994 · Human ServicesTEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI: $80,000 · Human ServicesSHE'S THE FIRST INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS: $48,764 · Human Services+4 more: $30,000 · Human Services
Other$10,283,511Environment$5,307,767Philanthropy$2,027,734International$1,887,680Arts & Culture$1,090,500Community Improvement$835,739Human Services$634,758

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOCEANA INC: $707,400 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetURBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK: $686,520 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $655,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetGLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP: $613,400 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE: $610,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE: $600,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $594,100 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSEATTLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $572,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetSMART GROWTH AMERICA: $545,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $465,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $450,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGirl Rising: $385,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetHealthy Reefs For Healthy People Inc: $351,300 over 1y, 25% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $337,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEnvironmental Law Institute: $330,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $328,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $304,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $300,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetASOCIACION INTERAMERICANA PARA LA DEFENSA DEL AMBIENTE: $260,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $225,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC: $200,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetTRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN INC: $175,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $171,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWINDWARD FUND: $170,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT: $160,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $150,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetSTAND: $150,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetISLAND PRESS: $150,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCOLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: $140,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $125,334 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomen Win Foundation Inc: $120,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $112,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR YOUTH EMPOWERMENT: $105,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetINTERNEWS NETWORK: $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPRING STREET CLIMATE FUND INC: $100,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE: $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetURGE UNITE FOR REPRODUCTIVE & GENDER EQUITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHISHOLM LEGACY PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CITY TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRIDERS ALLIANCE FUND INC: $100,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetEmerald Cities Collaborative Inc: $95,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMAIA: $95,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetGreater Greater Washington Commons: $90,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIniciativa Guatemala: $88,994 over 4y, 9.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMART GROWTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
  • Who funds Girl Rising ↗
  • Who funds Healthy Reefs For Healthy People Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Law Institute ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ASOCIACION INTERAMERICANA PARA LA DEFENSA DEL AMBIENTE ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS OUT FRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Co…The Ford FoundationUnited States Energy …New Venture FundFreedom Together Foun…Amalgamated Charitabl…Natural Resources Def…Rockefeller Philanthr…Barr FoundationThe Robert Wood Johns…Tides FoundationJohn D and Catherine …
Greater Washington Community FoundationDC44.5× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Ford Foundation · United States Energy Foundation · New Venture Fund · Freedom Together Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Barr Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Tides Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Summit Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Summit Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance: 39% of income from government
  • Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Boston Ballet Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Summit Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Summit Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 145 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Summit’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home