Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Suick Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$260kPhilanthropy$220kEducation$216kCommunity Improvement$165kEnvironment$62kRecreation & Sports$51kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kEmployment$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $145k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF LANGLADE COUNTY INCORPORATED$30,000
SENIOR CENTER$30,000
LANGLADE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$20,000
ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC$20,000
PELICAN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC$15,000
ANTIGO AREA RECREATION FOUNDATION INC$10,000
ANTIGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC$10,000
LANGLADE COUNTY SKI CLUB$10,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC$5,000
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOC$5,000
EPHRATA AREA SOCIAL SERVICES$2,500
WATER STREET MINISTRIES$2,500
EPHRATA AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR HAMILTON COUNTY INC$2,200
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR HAMILTON COUNTY INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WATER STREET MINISTRIES: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 18 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$1.0M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+219%

Still filing today

78%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Senior Center of Langlade County In
    7× · 2019–2025 · $248k · revenue +510% · 71% of their budget
  • LC
    LANGLADE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +86%
  • UW
    United Way of Langlade County Inc
    6× · 2018–2025 · $125k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • GP
    GIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lagrange County Economic Development Corporation

The lagrange county economic development corporation is the single point of contact for economic development efforts in lagrange county, indiana. we work with regional, state and federal partners to support and encourgage our clients'…

Community Improvement
2
Lancaster Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the chamber has 5 strategic priorities: public policy, workforce, business…

—
3
United Way of Lapeer County

To unite the community by developing resources to meet the community needs.

Philanthropy
4
Lakeshore Community Health Care Inc

Lakeshore community health care provides access to comprehensive, integrated health care, regardless of ability to pay, eliminating health disparities among the underserved.

Health
5
Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce

To be a voice for business and a forum for the exchange of ideas and through a variety of chamber programs and services, strengthen the economic vitality of east chicago, hammond, and northwest indiana.

Community Improvement
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
United Way of Lancaster County Inc

To positively impact lives by mobilizing people and resources in lancaster county with an emphasis on healthy communities, youth opportunities, financial security and community resiliency by partnering with organizations and community…

Philanthropy
8
Lake County in Economic Alliance Inc

Lcea is organized for the advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding of economics; matters of public concern; finance; education and training; science and technology; economic planning and development; and other subjects…

—
9
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
10
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Wisconsin Land and Water Conservation Association Inc

To protect, conserve, and enhance wisconsin's natural resources by advocating for and supporting county conservation efforts, for current and future generations.

Environment
12
Lake County Partnership for Economic Dev

To maintain economic vitality and quality of life in lake county, illinois by creating and retaining quality jobs, stimulating capital investment, pursuing economic diversity and improving the county's business climate.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocates Inc; the most unlike its peers is Senior Center of Langlade County in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Senior Center of Langlade County In: $247,500 · Community ImprovementSenior Center of Langlade County InLANGLADE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $165,000 · Community ImprovementLANGLADE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPOR…ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC: $125,000 · OtherALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOL INCANTIGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $73,000 · OtherANTIGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATI…VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $43,500 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INCVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANA: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $42,950 · Other+10 moreUnited Way of Langlade County Inc: $125,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Langlade …COVANTAGE CARES FOUNDATION INC: $58,500 · PhilanthropyCOVANTAGE CARES FOUNDAT…UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $36,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL I…PELICAN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $61,000 · Environment+2 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentLANGLADE COUNTY SKI CLUB INC: $31,000 · Recreation & SportsANTIGO AREA RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsMarian University: $15,000 · EducationWellness Council of Indiana Inc: $10,000 · EducationEPHRATA AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationSAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC: $9,000 · Public Benefit
Community Improvement$412,500Other$294,450Philanthropy$219,500Environment$63,000Recreation & Sports$51,000Education$28,000Public Benefit$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSenior Center of Langlade County In: $247,500 over 7y, 71% of budgetLANGLADE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $165,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetUnited Way of Langlade County Inc: $125,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetPELICAN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $61,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetCOVANTAGE CARES FOUNDATION INC: $58,500 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $36,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLANGLADE COUNTY SKI CLUB INC: $31,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetANTIGO AREA RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMarian University: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWellness Council of Indiana Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society for Hamilton County: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPHRATA AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Senior Center of Langlade County In ↗
  • Who funds LANGLADE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Langlade County Inc ↗
  • Who funds PELICAN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVANTAGE CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds LANGLADE COUNTY SKI CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTIGO AREA RECREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Marian University ↗
  • Who funds Wellness Council of Indiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL LEGACY GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society for Hamilton County ↗
  • Who funds WATER STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds EPHRATA AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EPHRATA AREA SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eugene & Marilyn Glick FoundationIN13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Lancaster County Community Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Suick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Suick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Suick Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph