Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stratton Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2017
10
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$28k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of The Stratton Foundation Inc’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year The Stratton Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $72k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
5
18
8
19
2
20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Philanthropy$141kEducation$93kReligion$26kYouth Development$19kArts & Culture$18kEnvironment$14kHousing & Shelter$10kAnimals$3k
02FY2017 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORP$27,500
MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL$10,000
YOUNG LIFE MILWAUKEE NORTH SHORE$9,000
FRIENDS OF SCHLITZ-AUDUBON CENTER I$6,500
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
SERENITY INNS INC$3,500
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC$3,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC$3,000
FOX POINT LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,000
ST CHRISTOPHER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERENITY INNS INC: $4k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $4k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$160k · 10 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2017, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$160k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+43%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • FRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +59%
  • SERENITY INNS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +217%

Funded once

  • TB
    TRINITY BY THE COVE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +43%
  • MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Public Museum Endowment Fund

Supporting the charitable, scientific and educational purposes of the milwaukee public museum.

2
Milwaukee School of Engineering

Milwaukee school of engineering (msoe) is a nonprofit, nonsectarian university providing a balanced education at the undergraduate and graduate level in the disciplines of engineering business, mathematics, and nursing. (see schedule o)…

Education
3
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

4
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
5
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

6
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
7
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

8
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
9
Wisconsin Museum of Nature and Culture

WMNC will continue constructing the new Milwaukee Public Museum facility to completion and will then continue as the owner and operator of the new museum.

Arts & Culture
10
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
11
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
12
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Serenity Inns Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC — $140,680 · PhilanthropyGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INCMILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL — $30,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOLYOUNG LIFE MILWAUKEE NORTH SHORE — $19,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE MILWAUKEE NORTH SHOR…TRINITY BY THE COVE EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $12,500 · OtherTRINITY BY THE COVE EPISCOPAL C…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDA…FOX POINT LUTHERAN CHURCH — $6,500 · OtherFOX POINT LUTHERAN CHURCHST CHRISTOPHER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $6,500 · OtherST CHRISTOPHER'S EPISCOPAL CHUR…VASSAR COLLEGE — $3,000 · Other+1 more — $2,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION — $50,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY SC…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC — $13,500 · EnvironmentSERENITY INNS INC — $9,500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$140,680Other$90,000Education$50,000Arts & Culture$18,000Environment$13,500Human Services$9,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC — $140,680 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC — $13,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSERENITY INNS INC — $9,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Rite-Hite Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stratton Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stratton Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Stratton Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph