Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stowe Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$271k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$157k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MEnvironment$699kReligion$198kHuman Services$173kPhilanthropy$65kRecreation & Sports$59kHealth$55kFood & Nutrition$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $209k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANIEL STOWE BOTANICAL GARDENS$157,000
FIRST AR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$51,500
PUT TOOLS IN SCHOOLS INC$20,000
HOLY ANGLES INC$5,000
ANIMAL LEAGUE$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER GASTO$3,000
CANCER SERVICES OF GASTON COUNTY IN$3,000
BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE$3,000
DAHLIA GROVE$2,500
BACK CREEK CHURCH$2,500
STAND FOR ANIMALS$1,760
GASTON LITERACY COUNCIL$1,750
BELMONT COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$1,500
BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME$1,500
CHARLOTTE FILM SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT VILLAGE: $3k → 12%LOAVES & FISHES: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 37 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
29

Total granted

$1.2M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+40%

Still filing today

62%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthReligionEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BACKPACK WEEKEND FOOD PROGRAM INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +40%
  • CR
    CATAWBA RIVERKEEPER FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +267%
  • BA
    BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • GC
    GASTON COUNTY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $1.3M
  • WF
    WARLICK FAMILY YMCA
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GASTON COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
2
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

—
3
The Charlotte Center for the Humanities Inc

The mission of The Charlotte Center is to help our community flourish. We accomplish our mission by bringing people together to explore community life together through the lens of the humanities and civic imagination.

Human Services
4
The Carolina Trust
Philanthropy
5
Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To engage and inspire our community to support caromont health in providing compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
6
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
7
Charlotte Regional Realtor Association Inc

The charlotte regional realtor (r) association (crra) is a trade association serving members in mecklenburg, iredell and haywood counties. at december 31, 2024, crra had 14,020 members.

—
8
Charlotte Regional Business Alliance

Collaborate to promote and advance the charlotte region, creating opportunity, economic growth and prosperity for all.

—
9
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
10
Carolina Meadows Foundation Inc

To solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. in order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.

Human Services
11
Carteret County General Hospital Foundation

To assist carteret general hospital in providing the best possible healthcare to the people of carteret county through fund raising programs that support community based programs, purchase of vital equipment, capital expansion, renovations…

Philanthropy
12
TreesCharlotte

Public/private collaborative to plant trees, raise awareness of the canopy, and educate about tree care.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Carolinas; the most unlike its peers is Seven Oaks Farm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/46
Grantees still filing
28/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GASTON COUNTY SCHOOLS: $1,333,333 · OtherGASTON COUNTY SCHOOLSDANIEL STOWE BOTANICAL GARDENS: $663,600 · OtherDANIEL STOWE BOTANICAL GARDENSWARLICK FAMILY YMCA: $150,000 · OtherWARLICK FAMILY YMCAFIRST AR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $143,000 · OtherFIRST AR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+53 more: $349,553 · Other+53 moreGASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $51,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS: $9,000 · PhilanthropySEVEN OAKS FARM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCATAWBA RIVERKEEPER FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 · EnvironmentCatawba Lands Conservancy: $6,000 · EnvironmentCANCER SERVICES OF GASTON CTY INC: $15,000 · HealthCAROMONT HEALTH: $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · HealthCarolina Breast Friends Inc: $1,921 · Health+2 more: $750 · HealthBACKPACK WEEKEND FOOD PROGRAM INC: $29,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC: $24,000 · EducationDogwood Classical Academy Inc: $3,000 · EducationROANOKE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $1,000 · EducationMcColl Center for Art Innovation: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCharlotte Master Chorale: $7,000 · Arts & CultureThe Little Theatre of Charlotte Inc dba Theatre Charlotte: $5,500 · Arts & CultureOPERA CAROLINA: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCharlotte Is Creative: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCharlotte Film Society: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,639,486Philanthropy$65,000Environment$35,000Health$31,671Food & Nutrition$30,500Education$30,000Arts & Culture$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAROLINA THREAD TRAIL: $51,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetGASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBACKPACK WEEKEND FOOD PROGRAM INC: $29,500 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetCATAWBA RIVERKEEPER FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY ANGELS INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SERVICES OF GASTON CTY INC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWorld Affairs Council of Charlotte: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMcColl Center for Art Innovation: $10,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCAROMONT HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $8,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetUSO OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLeroy Springs & Company Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCharlotte Master Chorale: $7,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCatawba Lands Conservancy: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Charlotte Inc: $5,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Little Theatre of Charlotte Inc dba Theatre Charlotte: $5,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSEVEN OAKS FARM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSpay Neuter Charlotte: $4,760 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER GAS: $4,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MECKLENBURG COUNTY COUNCIL: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGASTON LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $3,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFields of Hope: $2,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT VILLAGE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDahlia Grove: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOPERA CAROLINA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROANOKE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarolina Breast Friends Inc: $1,921 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN GASTON COUNTY: $1,600 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPAY IT FORWARD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNourish Up: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharlotte Is Creative: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCharlotte Film Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAROLINA FARM TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE BALLET: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLeighton Ford Ministries Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAROLINA THREAD TRAIL ↗
  • Who funds GASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BACKPACK WEEKEND FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CATAWBA RIVERKEEPER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF GASTON CTY INC ↗
  • Who funds World Affairs Council of Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds McColl Center for Art Innovation ↗
  • Who funds CAROMONT HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds USO OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Leroy Springs & Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds Charlotte Master Chorale ↗
  • Who funds Catawba Lands Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Little Theatre of Charlotte Inc dba Theatre Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN OAKS FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Spay Neuter Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER GAS ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MECKLENBURG COUNTY COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC43.4× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Gaston Community Foundation · The David Belk Cannon Foundation · The Carrie E and Lena V Glenn Found · Albemarle Foundation · Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc · The Howe Foundation Inc · Associated Foundation Incorporated · The Presbyterian Hospital · Arts & Science Council Charlotte/Mecklenburg Inc · Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stowe Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stowe Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stowe Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Stowe Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stowe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph