Skip to content

· Public charity

The Stone Table

To assist community, humanitarian and religious organizations in the united states and throughout the global community.

$4.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$4.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$14MCommunity Improvement$165kHousing & Shelter$104kFood & Nutrition$54kEducation$35kArts & Culture$30kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $4,494,305, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,592,564 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $98,259 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $157k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.2M
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNERSTONE CHURCH$4,154,022
AG SPRINGFIELD$53,875
DREAM CENTER$53,500
SINAPIS GROUP INC$50,000
OASIS REST INTERNATIONAL$35,300
RIVER VALLEY CHURCH$35,000
AGWM$30,000
FRONT YARD MISSION$22,500
HENDRICKS LIVE$15,000
BLACKBIRD MISSION$15,000
CHARITY CHURCH$11,500
CENTRO CRISTIANO DE GUAYAQUIL$10,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$8,608
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RIVER VALLEY CHURCH: $35k → 6%NORTH CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%FRONT YARD MISSION: $23k → 16%CENTRO CRISTIANO DE GUAYAQUIL: $10k → 6%ONE HOPE: $5k → 13%AG SPRINGFIELD: $54k → 15%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $9k → 15%OASIS REST INTERNATIONAL: $35k → 10%BLACKBIRD MISSION: $15k → 5%CROSSROADS CHURCH: $20k → 5%STABILITY FIRST: $50k → 9%COVENANT CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $28k → 16%CORNERSTONE CHURCH: $4.2M → 18%SINAPIS GROUP INC: $50k → 7%RIVER VALLEY CHURCH: $25k → 6%EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $25k → 11%AGWM: $30k → 15%HENDRICKS LIVE: $15k → 5%CHARITY CHURCH: $12k → 16%CORNERSTONE CHURCH: $2.4M → 18%SINAPIS GROUP INC: $30k → 7%RIVER VALLEY CHURCH: $20k → 6%THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $23k → 15%HENDRICKS LIVE: $15k → 5%LAKEVIEW CHURCH: $10k → 16%CORNERSTONE CHURCH: $2.1M → 18%SINAPIS GROUP INC: $30k → 7%RIVER VALLEY CHURCH: $20k → 6%THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $23k → 15%LAKEVIEW CHURCH: $10k → 16%CORNERSTONE CHURCH: $2.1M → 18%SINAPIS GROUP INC: $30k → 7%RIVER VALLEY CHURCH: $10k → 6%PATTERN RESOURCE GROUP: $10k → 15%LAKEVIEW CHURCH: $5k → 16%CORNERSTONE CHURCH: $1.5M → 18%SINAPIS GROUP INC: $25k → 7%DREAM CENTER: $54k → 16%CORNERSTONE CHURCH: $1.4M → 18%TRUTH AT WORK: $16k → 16%TRUTH AT WORK: $16k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
OR
IN
PA
CA
MO
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 7 repeat orgs$306k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$14M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
0%

Still filing today

43%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14M
  • SG
    SINAPIS GROUP INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $165k · revenue -15%
  • TG
    THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD
    3× · 2022–2025 · $130k

Funded once

  • SF
    STABILITY FIRST INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue +17%
  • EP
    EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Leadership Transformation Inc

Our vision is for churches and Christian organizations to be filled with leaders who place spiritual formation, discernment, and renewal above all other leadership priorities. Our mission is to cultivate vibrant spirituality and attentive…

Religion
4
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
5
Lakelight Institute

Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.

Religion
6
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
7
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
8
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
9
Indianapolis Theological Seminary

Indianapolis theological seminary exists to see a fully accredited theologically reformed mdiv program in central indiana that integrates leadership training in local churches with robust academic instruction for the sake of developing the…

Education
10
Midwest University

Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…

Education
11
Christian Leadership Alliance

Christian leadership alliance exists to equip and unite leaders called to transform the world for christ.

—
12
Champion Christian College Inc

To develop christ-centered servant leaders through a challenging academic environment in order to impact the world for the kingdom of god.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Covenant Christian Schools of Indianapolis Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stability First Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $13,767,312 · OtherCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP+11 more: $383,875 · OtherSINAPIS GROUP INC: $165,000 · EducationCOVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $28,067 · Education+1 more: $6,500 · EducationDREAM CENTER OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $53,500 · Housing & ShelterSTABILITY FIRST INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterLIFE IMPACT INC: $35,300 · ReligionTRUTH AT WORK INC: $32,400 · ReligionHENDRICKS LIVE INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $8,608 · Youth Development
Other$14,151,187Education$199,567Housing & Shelter$103,500Religion$67,700Arts & Culture$30,000Youth Development$8,608

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSINAPIS GROUP INC: $165,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSTABILITY FIRST INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTRUTH AT WORK INC: $32,400 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHENDRICKS LIVE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $28,067 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLakeview Temple Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $8,608 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central University: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SINAPIS GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CENTER OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
  • Who funds STABILITY FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH AT WORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HENDRICKS LIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lakeview Temple Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds North Central University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Crf Affordable Housing IncIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Crf Affordable Housing Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stone Table funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stone Table. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stone Table?

    Find your warmest path to The Stone Table through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stone Table’s filings →

    More from the funding graph