Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stewart B McKinney Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$1.4MHousing & Shelter$135kHuman Services$116kArts & Culture$61kEducation$56kHealth$47kAnimals$28kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIVING ACCOUNT 1279463$1,431,652
UNBRIDLED THOROUGHBRED FOUNDATION$12,500
ADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY$10,000
PINE ISLAND BEACON OF HOPE INC$10,000
MAKE A WISH WESTERN NEW YORK$9,600
FRIENDS OF CARLY$6,400
WESTPORT WESTON FAMILY YMCA$5,000
THE SILO AND HUNT HILL FARM$5,000
CROW (CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE)$5,000
BUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION$3,500
TEAM MOOSE RESCUE$2,500
NORTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
DELAWARE SOCCER CLUB$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WESTPORT WESTON FAMILY YMCA: $21k → 9%WESTPORT WESTON FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 63% of The Stewart B McKinney Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Stewart B McKinney Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 12 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$381k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+30%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $121k · revenue +6%
  • AJ
    ADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $46k · revenue +166%
  • TC
    The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $31k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • NH
    Norwalk Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • AJ
    ADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • JD
    JUSTICE DANCE PERFORMANCE PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
2
Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc

To raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to danbury and new milford hospitals and other not-for profit health care affiliates.

Health
3
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
4
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
5
The Norwalk Hospital Association

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
6
Bridgeport Hospital Foundation Inc

To support bridgeport hospital by, in large part, fundraising, and further, to fund and promote activities of the yale new haven health system, the integrated health care delivery system of which it is a part.

Health
7
Northeast Medical Group Inc

To render medical treatment to patients without regard to ability to pay for such treatment, and to promote a high quality of medical care and other services for the benefit of all persons in the communities it serves.

—
8
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
The Danbury Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
10
Newark-Wayne Community Hospital Foundation

To provide funds to or for the benefit of newark wayne community hospital, inc. by (a) soliciting, accepting, holding, investing, reinvesting and administering gifts, grants, bequests, contributions, devises, benefits of trusts, endowments…

Health
11
Western Connecticut Health Network Affiliates Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
12
Wmc-New York Inc

Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIVING ACCOUNT 1279463: $1,431,652 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE GIVING ACCOUNT 1279463PINE ISLAND BEACON OF HOPE INC: $60,000 · Other+18 more: $151,100 · Other+18 moreOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $121,000 · Housing & ShelterADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC: $45,500 · EducationNorwalk Hospital Foundation: $25,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF CARLY INC: $6,400 · HealthYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTPORT/WESTON CT INC: $25,500 · Human ServicesNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC: $23,500 · ReligionUNBRIDLED THOROUGHBRED FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Arts & CultureJUSTICE DANCE PERFORMANCE PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,642,752Housing & Shelter$121,000Education$45,500Health$31,400Human Services$25,500Religion$23,500Arts & Culture$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $121,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetADAM J LEWIS ACADEMY INC: $45,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $30,800 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTPORT/WESTON CT INC: $25,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC: $23,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUNBRIDLED THOROUGHBRED FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJUSTICE DANCE PERFORMANCE PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNORTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COMMUNITY FOUND: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBUFFALO SABRES FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE SOCCER CLUB INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Near and Far Association IncCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Near and Far Association Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stewart B McKinney Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stewart B McKinney Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Nourish Bridgeport Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Justice Dance Performance Project Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stewart B McKinney Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Stewart B McKinney Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stewart B McKinney’s filings →

More from the funding graph