Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Steven & Valerie Stafstrom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$10kInternational$10kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$2kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$236k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITANS PURSE$2,500
MANN FOOD BANK$2,031
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JH GREENBERGER CANCER CNTRE$1,000
BCAN$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
REPSRYAN$500
SOUTH MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS HOME$500
NATURE CONSERVANCY$500
BURKE CTY 4H$500
NOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC$500
MCDOWELL CTY 4H$500
UND RUGBY CLUB$250
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$250
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%SOUTH MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
CT
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36k · 17 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
18

Total granted

$36k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+14%

Still filing today

24%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MANNA FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +169%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +40%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • JG
    JH GREENBERG CANCER CTR
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • NB
    NOURISH BRIDGEPORT
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
National Women's Shelter Network Inc

Our mission is to advance the status of women,youth,children and families experiencing homelessness in our country, and the womens, youth and family shelters and safe havens that serve them, and end and prevent homelessness. we do so by:…

Housing & Shelter
9
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
10
Chemists Without Borders

Chemists without borders is a global humanitarian organization committed to sustainable and equitable solutions that empower communities and improve overall well-being. our strategic framework is: service - developing, facilitating, and…

Science & Tech
11
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
12
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH FOUND: $3,000 · OtherUNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH FOUNDBCAN: $2,250 · OtherBCANJOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTER: $2,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS CANCER CENTERMCDOWELL CITY 4H: $1,000 · OtherBURKE CITY 4H: $1,000 · OtherMCDOWELL CTY 4H: $1,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVATORY: $1,000 · OtherJH GREENBERGER CANCER CNTRE: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherJH GREENBERG CANCER CTR: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · OtherSOUTHMOUNTAIN CHILDRENS HOME: $1,000 · OtherBURKE CTY 4H: $1,000 · OtherNOURISH BRIDGEPORT: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · Other+16 more: $6,157 · Other+16 moreMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $8,031 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK IN…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S …NOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC: $500 · ReligionNOURISH BRID…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,614 · InternationalUNITED STA…Save The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 · InternationalSave The C…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHMOUNTAIN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $500 · Human ServicesBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING: $258 · HealthHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE: $250 · HealthUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $500 · EducationMERCYFUND: $250 · Animals
Other$27,407Food & Nutrition$8,031Religion$5,500International$4,614Human Services$3,500Health$508Education$500Animals$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $8,031 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,614 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHMOUNTAIN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCYFUND: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHMOUNTAIN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds NOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds BEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING ↗
  • Who funds MERCYFUND ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Steven & Valerie Stafstrom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Steven & Valerie Stafstrom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Nourish Bridgeport Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steven & Valerie Stafstrom’s filings →

More from the funding graph