Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stephen and Deborah Harnik Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$70kEducation$22kPhilanthropy$20kPublic Benefit$16kFood & Nutrition$7kCrime & Legal$6kCivil Rights$5kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
5
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AAF SALZBURG WEILL CORNELL$4,000
NY TIMES NEEDIEST CASES FUND$4,000
NEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS$1,500
FREUD FOUNDATION US$1,000
SBT CHARITABLE FUND$1,000
TFFJ-TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE$1,000
ELYSIUM BETWEEN TWO CONTINENTS$750
CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN$500
SWARTHMORE COLLEGE$350
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV$350
MYRIAD USA$250
ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION$250
STXBP1 FOUNDATION$250
PIANOFEST INC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $500 → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $250 → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $400 → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $200 → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $200 → 17%INNOCENT PROJECT: $200 → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$134k · 31 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
51

Total granted

$134k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+17%

Still filing today

65%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VIENNESE OPERA BALL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k · revenue +304% · 38% of their budget
  • PA
    PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +110%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • GR
    Georges River Land Trust
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -23%
  • GS
    GERMAN-AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -65%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
4
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Inc

The Knight First Amendment Institute defends the freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through strategic litigation, research, public advocacy and public education. Our aim is to promote a system of free expression that is…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the most unlike its peers is Freud Foundation Us. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
32/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FUND: $16,200 · OtherAMERICAN AUSTRIAN FUNDAAF SALZBURG WEILL CORNELL: $12,125 · OtherAAF SALZBURG WEILL CORNELLAAF SALZBURG WEILL CORNELL S: $8,000 · OtherAAF SALZBURG WEILL CORNELL STFFJ-TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $5,000 · OtherTFFJ-TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICESBC CHARITABLE FUND: $3,950 · OtherSBT CHARITABLE FUND: $2,750 · Other+52 more: $29,785 · Other+52 moreVIENNESE OPERA BALL: $14,000 · Arts & CultureVIENNESE OPERA BALLPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $10,995 · Arts & CulturePEN AMERICAN CENTER INCNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $6,850 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIOTHE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY …FREUD FOUNDATION US: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $3,150 · Arts & Culture+4 moreCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $9,950 · EducationCASE WESTER…SWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $3,150 · EducationSWARTHMORE …NEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC: $1,750 · EducationNEW CLASSRO…+6 more: $1,569 · Education+6 moreTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $11,500 · PhilanthropySOUTHAMPTON BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4,600 · Human ServicesTEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC: $750 · Human ServicesELYSIUM BETWEEN TWO CONTINENTS INC: $1,250 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $800 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC: $250 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $100 · InternationalGeorges River Land Trust: $1,500 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $500 · Environment
Other$77,810Arts & Culture$41,995Education$16,419Philanthropy$12,500Human Services$5,350International$2,400Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIENNESE OPERA BALL: $14,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $10,995 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $9,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $6,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $3,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFREUD FOUNDATION US: $2,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $1,550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Virginia: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGeorges River Land Trust: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELYSIUM BETWEEN TWO CONTINENTS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGERMAN-AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBER CHORAL ARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLUNA STAGE COMPANY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDC Greens Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPianofest Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEUGENE ZITWER FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CHILDREN'S DAY SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCAN-HARBOR INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NIEMANN-PICK DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ROGERS MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $19 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIENNESE OPERA BALL ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds THE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FREUD FOUNDATION US ↗
  • Who funds NEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia ↗
  • Who funds Georges River Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds ELYSIUM BETWEEN TWO CONTINENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds GERMAN-AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHAMPTON BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FUND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Mark Zurack & Kathy Ferguson FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Mark Zurack & Kathy Ferguson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stephen and Deborah Harnik Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stephen and Deborah Harnik Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stephen and Deborah Harnik Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Stephen and Deborah Harnik Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen and Deborah Harnik’s filings →

    More from the funding graph