· Community foundation
The Stateline Community Foundation Inc
Stateline community foundation is dedicated to identifying and responding to community needs through strategic partnerships, informed grantmaking, and inspired philanthropy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $192,776 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $438,900 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $246,124 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $129k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF PAUL'S COMPUTER INSTITUTE | $24,200 |
| CARITAS INC | $23,600 |
| FRIENDS OF RIVERFRONT INC | $18,600 |
| UNITED CHURCH OF BELOIT | $14,450 |
| BELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $13,159 |
| BELOIT JANESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC | $12,350 |
| BELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM | $12,100 |
| SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BELOIT | $10,403 |
| LITTLE TURTLE'S PLAYHOUSE INC | $9,900 |
| BELOIT COLLEGE | $9,000 |
| CITY OF BELOIT | $8,982 |
| BELOIT PUBLIC LIBRARY | $8,100 |
| STATELINE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC | $6,912 |
| FRIENDS OF THE WELTY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER INC | $5,400 |
| KANDU INDUSTRIES INC | $5,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $284k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICARITAS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +136%
- FOFRIENDS OF RIVERFRONT INC7× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +45% · 44% of their budget
- BMBeloit Meals on Wheels Inc5× · 2019–2023 · $92k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- BBBEREAN BAPTIST CHURCH OF BELOITone grant, 2023 · $14k
- TGTHE GREATER BELOIT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +60%
- SLSTATELINE LITERACY COUNCIL INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +60%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chamber of commerce to support, ancourage and engage in activities that make the greater Beloit area a better place to live and do business.
An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…
The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…
Bethany is a faith-based, non-profit senior living community proving a nurturing christian environment and continuum of care that responds to individual needs and choices at all life stages.
The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.
To lead and coordinate destination development projects in the greater beloit region through public and private funding, as well as manage grant and sponsorship programs.
Healthy wisconsin alliance, inc. was created to promote the social welfare of the citizens of wisconsin including developing, defining, and encouraging distribution of information about wisconsin's health care climate and the importance of…
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.
The mission of the corporation is to provide a quality pre-hospital emergency medical service ("ems") to the residents and guests in the corporation's service area. the corporation will, to the best of its ability, respond to emergency and…
Community shares of wisconsin (csw), together with its donors and approximately 70 member nonprofits, addresses social, economic, and environmental problems through grassroots activities, advocacy, research and public education.
Changing lives by strengthening literacy statewide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beloit Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is Beloit City Wide Youth Softbal. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PAUL'S COMPUTER INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CARITAS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RIVERFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds Beloit Meals on Wheels Inc ↗
- Who funds BELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds STATELINE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT JANESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE TURTLES PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WELTY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NUTRITION AND HEALTH ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER BELOIT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds STATELINE LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN-ROCK AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF ROCK & WALWORTH COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds BELOIT CITY WIDE YOUTH SOFTBAL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds ROCK COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER BELOIT INC ↗
- Who funds KANDU INDUSTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Morse Col Robert H Fdn Tr · United Way Blackhawk Region Inc · Hendricks Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · The Lans Foundation · Regal Beloit Charitable Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Dorothy E Bigelow Charitable Trust 120061 · Neese Family Foundation Inc · Jpc Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stateline Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.