· Private foundation
Hendricks Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $264k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $881k
- $250k+3 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE LINCOLN ACADEMY | $2,050,000 |
| STATELINE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC | $630,000 |
| FISCC INC | $325,000 |
| BELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC | $200,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN WI | $200,000 |
| ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $181,000 |
| WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS INC | $100,000 |
| ROCK VALLEY COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC | $100,000 |
| ST JOHN'S NORTHWESTERN MILITARY ACADEMY INC | $100,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ROCK COUNTY | $37,500 |
| FRIENDS OF WELTY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER | $35,000 |
| BELOIT ART CENTER | $30,000 |
| BELOIT INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL | $29,000 |
| SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN | $25,000 |
| NAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $614k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +3% · 32% of their budget
ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION5× · 2020–2024 · $923k · revenue +303%- SJST JOHN'S NORTHWESTERN ACADEMIES4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- BOBOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEMone grant, 2020 · $120k
- JPJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +114%
- PCPARKER CHOIR BOOSTER CLUBone grant, 2020 · $51k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chamber of commerce to support, ancourage and engage in activities that make the greater Beloit area a better place to live and do business.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
The wisconsin broadcasters association foundation contribution to broadcasting in wisconsin encompasses a strategic, long term vision for enhancing, promoting and supporting the broadcast industry by encouraging the preservation of…
An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…
To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.
United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…
Wisconsin principles (wp) is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization dedicated to preserving conservative values in the state of wisconsin. committed to fiscal conservatism, educational choice, and individual liberty, we strive to empower…
The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.
Inspiring individuals and communities through exceptional music education, accessible to all.
The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…
To provide financial support from time to time to further certain of the exempt purposes of the wisconsin lions foundation, inc.
Community shares of wisconsin (csw), together with its donors and approximately 70 member nonprofits, addresses social, economic, and environmental problems through grassroots activities, advocacy, research and public education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services of Southern Wisconsin and Northern Illinois Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rock River Repertory Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE LINCOLN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds STATELINE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S NORTHWESTERN ACADEMIES ↗
- Who funds FISCC INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROCK VALLEY COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds BLACKHAWK TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WELTY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds STATELINE LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KFAD INC ↗
- Who funds RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Nikolas Ritschel Foundation ↗
- Who funds BELOIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CDMHS TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTSUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds JANESVILLE LIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BELOIT JANESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELOIT CITY WIDE YOUTH SOFTBAL ↗
- Who funds THE WISCONSIN AMERICAN LEGION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · The Stateline Community Foundation Inc · Morse Col Robert H Fdn Tr · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Neese Family Foundation Inc · Jpc Foundation · Seneca Foods Foundation · The Lans Foundation · Janesville Foundation Inc · Kennedy Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hendricks Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hendricks Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hendricks Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.