Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stanley & Nancy Grossman Family Foundation C/O Pomerantz LLP

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$164kReligion$114kArts & Culture$59kPhilanthropy$28kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$8kCivil Rights$7kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BNOS MENACHEM SCHOOL$17,400
LINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE$13,427
CHABAD OF SCOTTSDALE$10,029
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$10,000
LEOPOLD SCHEPP FDN$5,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH$2,570
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILTY AND ETHICS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,250
COVENANT HOUSE$1,020
CHABAD RELIEF FUND$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FRESH AIR FUND$550
PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION$500
AMERICAN CANCER ASSOC$500
SOUTHHAMPTON HOSPITAL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $120 → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MANHATTAN: $180 → 9%HARRISON CHILDRENS CENTER: $100 → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $385 → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MANHATTAN: $1k → 17%DOROT: $360 → 17%DOROT: $180 → 17%DOROT: $180 → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $103 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
SD
IA
PA
CT
CA
MO
MD
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$377k · 37 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
29

Total granted

$377k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+24%

Still filing today

32%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationInternationalReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +50%
  • T
    T'RUAH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +10%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • UA
    Urban Arts Partnershipgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • BH
    BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +59%
  • TB
    THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Berggruen Institute
Education
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leopold Schepp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF PENN: $55,360 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PENNTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $47,500 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERALINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE INC: $45,018 · OtherLINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE INCCHABAD OF SCOTTSDALE: $40,109 · OtherCHABAD OF SCOTTSDALEBNOS MENACHEM SCHOOL: $34,254 · OtherBNOS MENACHEM SCHOOLCHABAD LUBAVITCH: $15,456 · OtherUJA: $12,800 · OtherNEW VISION PUBLIC SCHOOL: $12,000 · Other+47 more: $48,703 · Other+47 moreBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationBROOKLYN LAW S…+3 more: $1,801 · EducationLeopold Schepp Foundation: $25,000 · PhilanthropyT'RUAH: $6,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $511 · International+1 more: $108 · InternationalCOVENANT HOUSE: $3,905 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $1,180 · Human ServicesDOROT INC: $720 · Human Services+3 more: $323 · Human ServicesBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $3,105 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $720 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art: $410 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $360 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $300 · Arts & CultureTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $140 · Arts & Culture
Other$311,200Education$51,801Philanthropy$25,000International$6,619Human Services$6,128Health$3,605Arts & Culture$1,930

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeopold Schepp Foundation: $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUrban Arts Partnership: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetT'RUAH: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $3,905 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $3,105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,185 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $1,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $970 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $720 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $511 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $140 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRISON CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $51 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Leopold Schepp Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Urban Arts Partnership ↗
  • Who funds T'RUAH ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stanley & Nancy Grossman Family Foundation C/O Pomerantz LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stanley & Nancy Grossman Family Foundation C/O Pomerantz LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stanley & Nancy Grossman Family Foundation C/O Pomerantz LLP’s filings →

More from the funding graph