Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stan and Betty Krehbiel Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$390k
Granted FY2023
16
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$279k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$374kHuman Services$71kInternational$53kHousing & Shelter$28kReligion$19kHealth$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2023 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k12 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $94k
  • $250k+1 grant · $279k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$279,326
IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$39,800
IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$34,753
IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$19,721
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,000
UNION RESCUE MISSION$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION$1,000
MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE$1,000
SHELTER BOX USA$1,000
EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND$1,000
CENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED$1,000
STEPSTONE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHELTER BOX USA: $3k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%HUMANKIND: $750 → 8%SHELTER BOX USA: $2k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HUMANKIND: $750 → 8%SHELTER BOX USA: $1k → 10%HUMANKIND: $750 → 8%SHELTER BOX USA: $1k → 10%SHELTER BOX USA: $1k → 10%SHELTER BOX USA: $1k → 10%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 16%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA: $100 → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $500 → 16%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA: $50 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 24 repeat orgs$381k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$198k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+52%

Still filing today

63%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $374k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +99%
  • SU
    SHELTERBOX USA INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $9k · revenue +123%
  • PC
    PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION
    5× · 2018–2023 · $9k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • UR
    UKRAINE RELIEF
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IF
    ICT FOOD RESCUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Humankind Ministries Wichita Inc

Humankind ministries provides street outreach, shelter, affordable housing, supportive services, and basic needs to those experiencing homelessness or poverty in sedgwick county. recognizing the inherent value of each person, we serve the…

Religion
3
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
4
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
5
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
6
Hutchinson County Crisis Center Inc

Hutchinson county crisis center is a community based nonprofit agency committed to ending the cycle of domestic violence and sexual assault by providing safe residence for victims and their children, legal advocacy, interactive listening,…

Crime & Legal
7
Hillcrest Ministries of Midamerica

The mission of hillcrest transitional housing is to be a transitional housing program that helps move homeless families and youth from homelessness to self-sufficiency, becoming self-supportingself-reliant contributors to society.

Human Services
8
Family Promise of Greater Wichita

To empower families with children to overcome homelessness and housing insecurity through a holistic approach, community involvement, and sustainable solutions.

Human Services
9
First Step of Wichita Falls Inc

To provide free crisis intervention services for individuals who have recently experienced domestic and/or sexual violence, leading to emotional, mental, and physical problems.

Health
10
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
11
Shelter Kc

Shelter kc is a christ-centered community offering freedom and hope to the poor and homeless empowering them to have healthy relationships, dignity, and transformational growth.

Housing & Shelter
12
Catholic Charities of Southwest Kansas

To provide quality services to people of all faiths, backgrounds, and ethnicities in a manner that best serves the needs of the client.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Family Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Ipc National Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $373,600 · PhilanthropyIPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONSALVATION ARMY: $43,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYROTARY FOUNDATION: $42,500 · OtherROTARY FOUNDATIONMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE CENTRAL STATES INC: $12,750 · OtherMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTE…UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WICHITA INC: $8,500 · OtherUNION RESCUE MISSION OF WI…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6,000 · Other+12 more: $20,625 · Other+12 moreTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $2,500 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS: $2,250 · Human Services+1 more: $150 · Human ServicesPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $8,500 · Housing & ShelterSTEPSTONE INC: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterLAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $11,000 · HealthEPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $3,250 · HealthCENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED: $6,000 · Community ImprovementThe Brookwood Community Inc: $5,000 · EducationMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $400 · Education
Philanthropy$373,600Other$133,875Human Services$26,400Housing & Shelter$19,000Health$14,250Community Improvement$6,000Education$5,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $373,600 over 1y, 14% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPSTONE INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC: $4,050 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $3,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetICT FOOD RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STEPSTONE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds DEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS ↗
  • Who funds ICT FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds MCPHERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita FoundationKS21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Paul Ross Charitable Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Mosby Lincoln Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · United Way of the Plains Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Jessica Good Evans Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stan and Betty Krehbiel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stan and Betty Krehbiel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stan and Betty Krehbiel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph