· Private foundation
The Stan and Betty Krehbiel Family Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k12 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $94k
- $250k+1 grant · $279k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $279,326 |
| IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $39,800 |
| IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $34,753 |
| IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $19,721 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $2,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND | $1,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $1,000 |
| STEPSTONE | $1,000 |
| UNION RESCUE MISSION | $1,000 |
| CENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED | $1,000 |
| PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION | $1,000 |
| SHELTER BOX USA | $1,000 |
| EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES | $1,000 |
| MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $374k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +99%
- SUSHELTERBOX USA INC6× · 2018–2023 · $9k · revenue +123%
- PCPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION5× · 2018–2023 · $9k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $3k
- URUKRAINE RELIEFone grant, 2022 · $2k
- IFICT FOOD RESCUE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Humankind ministries provides street outreach, shelter, affordable housing, supportive services, and basic needs to those experiencing homelessness or poverty in sedgwick county. recognizing the inherent value of each person, we serve the…
Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.
To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.
At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…
Hutchinson county crisis center is a community based nonprofit agency committed to ending the cycle of domestic violence and sexual assault by providing safe residence for victims and their children, legal advocacy, interactive listening,…
The mission of hillcrest transitional housing is to be a transitional housing program that helps move homeless families and youth from homelessness to self-sufficiency, becoming self-supportingself-reliant contributors to society.
To empower families with children to overcome homelessness and housing insecurity through a holistic approach, community involvement, and sustainable solutions.
To provide free crisis intervention services for individuals who have recently experienced domestic and/or sexual violence, leading to emotional, mental, and physical problems.
To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.
Shelter kc is a christ-centered community offering freedom and hope to the poor and homeless empowering them to have healthy relationships, dignity, and transformational growth.
To provide quality services to people of all faiths, backgrounds, and ethnicities in a manner that best serves the needs of the client.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Family Crisis Center and the most unlike its peers is Ipc National Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IPC NATIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION ↗
- Who funds STEPSTONE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED ↗
- Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
- Who funds DEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS ↗
- Who funds ICT FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds MCPHERSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Paul Ross Charitable Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Mosby Lincoln Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · United Way of the Plains Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Jessica Good Evans Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stan and Betty Krehbiel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.