· Private foundation
The Staggs Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SIMS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION | $4,500 |
| RIVERSIDE NATURE CENTER ASSOCIATION | $4,500 |
| SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue -8%
- TBTRUTH BE TOLD5× · 2018–2022 · $22k · revenue -79%
- SPSEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +62%
Funded once
MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +138%- APAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +30%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
Food distribution to the hungry throughout an eight county service territory in Southeast Texas.
The High Plains Food Bank exists to help solve the issue of hunger and food insecurity in the Texas Panhandle.
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…
California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…
To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.
Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.
Reduce hunger and help the environment by connecting surplus food with our neighbors in need.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SIMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUTH BE TOLD ↗
- Who funds SEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE NATURE CENTER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Staggs Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Staggs Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Staggs Family’s filings →