Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Staggs Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$56kFood & Nutrition$45kCrime & Legal$22kEnvironment$20kArts & Culture$5kAnimals$3k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$314k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIMS FOUNDATION$5,000
RIVERSIDE NATURE CENTER ASSOCIATION$4,500
HILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION$4,500
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$2,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$2,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 42% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%SEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY: $5k → 18%MAUI FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%TRUTH BE TOLD: $5k → 10%HILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%SEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY: $5k → 18%TRUTH BE TOLD: $5k → 10%RIVERSIDE NATURE CENTER ASSOCIATION: $5k → 13%SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $2k → 16%SEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY: $5k → 18%TRUTH BE TOLD: $5k → 10%SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $2k → 16%TRUTH BE TOLD: $4k → 10%TRUTH BE TOLD: $3k → 10%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%AUSTIN PETS ALIVE: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$135k · 6 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$135k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+138%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SIMS FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue -8%
  • TB
    TRUTH BE TOLD
    5× · 2018–2022 · $22k · revenue -79%
  • SP
    SEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +138%
  • AP
    AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
3
Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc

Food distribution to the hungry throughout an eight county service territory in Southeast Texas.

Human Services
4
High Plains Food Bank

The High Plains Food Bank exists to help solve the issue of hunger and food insecurity in the Texas Panhandle.

5
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

6
South Texas Food Bank

To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…

Community Improvement
7
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
8
Hays County Food Bank

To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.

9
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
10
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
12
Keep Austin Fed

Reduce hunger and help the environment by connecting surplus food with our neighbors in need.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Truth Be Told. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SIMS FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 · HealthTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INCLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $14,200 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL …SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $14,100 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKTRUTH BE TOLD — $22,000 · Crime & LegalTRUTH BE TOLDSEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY — $15,000 · EnvironmentSEQUOIA PARKS …RIVERSIDE NATURE CENTER ASSOCIATION — $4,500 · EnvironmentRIVERSIDE NATU…Central Texas Food Bank Inc — $14,100 · Food & NutritionCentral Texa…MAUI FOOD BANK INC — $3,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BA…HILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION — $4,500 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $3,000 · Animals
Health$56,000Other$28,300Crime & Legal$22,000Environment$19,500Food & Nutrition$17,100Arts & Culture$4,500Animals$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetTRUTH BE TOLD — $22,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSEQUOIA PARKS CONSERVANCY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $14,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $14,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $14,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Staggs Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph