Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Spencer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24M
Granted FY2025still arriving
214
Grants FY2025still arriving
38
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$90MScience & Tech$4.1MHealth$4.0MArts & Culture$2.3MRecreation & Sports$2.0MCivil Rights$1.9MYouth Development$1.8MPhilanthropy$1.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 214 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k59 grants · $2.2M
  • $50k–250k143 grants · $14M
  • $250k+10 grants · $8.0M
$74,964
Median grant
38
States reached
$665M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EDUCATION$2,532,835
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EDUCATION$1,753,042
WILLIAM T GRANT FOUNDATION$650,000
WILLIAM T GRANT FOUNDATION$650,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$593,600
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$483,044
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$392,629
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS CENTER FOR RESEARCH INC$382,906
Individual grant recipient$274,540
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$250,850
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$243,904
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON$229,772
INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON$221,301
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$212,830
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$209,723
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Justice and Joy National Collaborative: $75k → 12%Jespy House: $2k → 16%Metropolitan Family Services: $5k → 14%Pine Street Inn: $6k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%Division of Indian Work: $50k → 11%St Francis House Inc: $6k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $4k → 16%Night Ministry: $2k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $750 → 14%Night Ministry: $750 → 14%Northwestern University Settlement: $750 → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $15k → 14%YMCA Of Metropolitan Chicago: $15k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $14k → 14%New Moms Inc: $750 → 14%LEAP Innovations: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Spencer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Spencer Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88M · 196 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

196 repeat relationships: 89 still active in FY2025, 107 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

196
255

Total granted

$88M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+9%

Still filing today

51%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WILLIAM T GRANT FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +118%
  • NY
    New York University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +21%
  • Northwestern University
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • POMONA COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $671k · revenue +106%
  • PU
    Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
  • UO
    University of KwaZulu-Natal
    one grant, 2022 · $399k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grantmakers for Education; the most unlike its peers is The National Academy of Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

274 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 274 of the 519 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
271/274
Grantees still filing
172/274
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The University of Texas at Austin: $2,928,240 · OtherThe University of Texas at AustinWILLIAM T GRANT FOUNDATION INC: $2,899,678 · OtherWILLIAM T GRANT FOUNDATION INCThe Regents of the University of California: $2,741,307 · OtherThe Regents of the University of CaliforniaTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $2,354,829 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,852,581 · Other+123 more: $38,572,575 · Other+123 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,937,913 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UN…New York University: $1,905,124 · EducationNew York UniversityTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,584,745 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TH…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,400,056 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALI…Vanderbilt University: $1,070,390 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,033,109 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,020,612 · Education+50 more: $14,091,468 · Education+50 moreTHE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EDUCATION: $21,236,774 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF …+6 more: $941,666 · Arts & CultureNorthwestern University: $1,861,511 · Recreation & SportsSTRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $639,190 · Science & TechUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $439,078 · Science & TechNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $220,000 · Science & TechBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,222,473 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER: $372,548 · Social ScienceTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $240,325 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $124,945 · Social Science
Other$51,349,210Education$25,043,417Arts & Culture$22,178,440Recreation & Sports$1,861,511Science & Tech$1,298,268Community Improvement$1,222,473Social Science$737,818

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EDUCATION: $21,236,774 over 5y, 43% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,937,913 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM T GRANT FOUNDATION INC: $2,899,678 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetNew York University: $1,905,124 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,861,511 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,584,745 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,478,469 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,400,056 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,222,473 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $1,070,390 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,033,109 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,020,612 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $743,474 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $690,847 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $671,438 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE: $639,190 over 3y, 19% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $615,999 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $603,587 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $549,493 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $538,273 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $522,398 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCSU FULLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION: $509,897 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPHILADELPHIA STUDENT UNION: $500,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetLearning Policy Institute: $483,750 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $464,431 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $439,078 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $423,113 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $422,453 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $409,444 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $388,222 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER: $372,548 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING SOCIETY: $338,826 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $324,527 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $316,666 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $311,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $299,508 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMPLIFY GIRLS INC: $290,089 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $289,532 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $287,123 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $282,871 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $272,704 over 2y, 24% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $269,888 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetADELPHI UNIVERSITY: $254,472 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $243,448 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $240,325 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $220,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $214,979 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM T GRANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds STRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA53.3× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Walton Family Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · William T Grant Foundation Inc · Field Foundation of Illinois · WK Kellogg Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Heising-Simons Foundation · The Wallace Foundation · The Ford Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Spencer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Spencer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • National Florence Crittenton Mission: 24% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences: 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Pacific University: 2% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: 1% of income from government
  • Suffolk University: 1% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
  • Lesley University: 1% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Drew University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Spencer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Spencer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 519 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spencer’s filings →

More from the funding graph