Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sidney Hillman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0119% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Civil Rights$28kCrime & Legal$26kArts & Culture$18kEmployment$9kInternational$6kEducation$5kPublic Benefit$5kHealth$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
10
States reached
$965k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,843
Individual grant recipient$1,400
CONTRA COSTA JUSTICE ALLIANCE$1,000
FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$922
Individual grant recipient$922
Individual grant recipient$922
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($288k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($41k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHAWN MARTIN: $2k → 11%ROBIN MCDOWELL: $250 → 6%JESSICA GRIFFIN: $2k → 7%ABRAHAM GUTMAN: $500 → 22%JENNIFER GOLLAN: $3k → 10%WILL PARRISH: $250 → 13%ANGELIKA ALBALADEJO: $500 → 14%SHERI FINK: $250 → 17%JOSH DZIEZA: $500 → 20%PAMELA COLLOFF: $5k → 10%HAROLD MEYERSON: $8k → 14%MICHAEL SAINATO: $2k → 19%MELISSA LEWIS: $3k → 12%SPJ'S EMERGENCY FUND FOR JOURNALISTS: $300 → 16%MIKE BAKER: $250 → 9%MARGIE MASON: $250 → 19%IN THESE TIMES: $7k → 14%ANNA WOLFE: $250 → 23%MACKENZIE HUBER: $500 → 9%DAVID BISCOBING: $2k → 11%DYLAN PURCELL: $2k → 7%WORKERS UNITED: $9k → 22%HENDRIK HERTZBERG: $3k → 17%ALLEEN BROWN: $250 → 20%AMERICAN PROSPECT: $7k → 14%MICHELLE LIU: $250 → 23%GERARD WATSON: $2k → 11%SAMANTHA MELAMED: $2k → 22%DISSENT: $12k → 17%JAIME LONGORIA: $3k → 20%RACHEL LOUISE SNYDER: $5k → 14%TA-NEHISI COATES: $5k → 17%MICHELLE GOLDBERG: $5k → 20%SETH WESSLER: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($41k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$35k · 15 grants
United Kingdom$6k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 16 repeat orgs$275k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
112

Total granted

$53k
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+16%

Still filing today

19%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue -31%
  • PRO PUBLICA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +44%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k

Funded once

  • D
    DISSENT
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • WU
    WORKERS UNITED
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Conversationalist
—
2
Press Watch

To educate journalists and the public, and foster public debate, about improving political journalism to reflect public needs and hold the powerful accountable.

—
3
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
4
The Liberal Patriot Inc

The liberal patriot (tlp) is a digital newsletter focused on american politics and public policy. tlp aims to provide readers with honest analysis and original commentary to help advance a vital center perspective in american life.

Civil Rights
5
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
6
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
7
Free Press Action Fund

Free press action fund fights for your rights to connect and communicate. we fight to save the free and open internet, curb runaway media consolidation, protect press freedom, and promote digital civil rights. we believe that change…

Civil Rights
8
Sociedad Interamericana De Prensa Inc

Between 2024 and 2025, the committee on freedom of the press and information, together with its subcommittees on impunity and chapultepecsalta, participated in approximately nine activities. these included a panel discussion entitled…

Education
9
The Intercept Media Inc

The intercept media, inc. is the publisher of the intercept, a news organization that educates the public through its investigative journalism with a focus on the environment, criminal justice, national security, technology and immigration.

Arts & Culture
10
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
11
Kurt Schork Memorial Fund
Education
12
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro Publica Inc; the most unlike its peers is Black Transwomen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DISSENT: $12,000 · Other+149 more: $275,149 · Other+149 moreTHE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC: $7,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $5,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $5,700 · Civil RightsMORE PERFECT UNION FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Civil RightsTHE ST LUKE FOUNDATION FOR HAITI: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $625 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 · InternationalREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 · InternationalCURIOUS COMMUNICATIONS INC: $5,000 · Public BenefitTHE ALGEBRA PROJECT INC: $5,000 · EducationBELT MEDIA COLLABORATIVE: $1,000 · Human ServicesBLACK TRANSWOMEN INC: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$287,149Arts & Culture$12,600Civil Rights$10,700International$6,625Public Benefit$5,000Education$5,000Human Services$1,000Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $5,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCURIOUS COMMUNICATIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ALGEBRA PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMORE PERFECT UNION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ST LUKE FOUNDATION FOR HAITI: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST AMENDMENT COALITION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELT MEDIA COLLABORATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CURIOUS COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALGEBRA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MORE PERFECT UNION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ST LUKE FOUNDATION FOR HAITI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Park Foundation IncNY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Park Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sidney Hillman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sidney Hillman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sidney Hillman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph