· Private foundation
The Shemesh Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
62% of The Shemesh Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Donors Fund Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Shemesh Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $499k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k6 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $101k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $368k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVA MEOR HATALMUD OF LAKEWOOD | $140,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| THE DONORS FUND | $78,000 |
| CONGREGATION MISHKAN YECHESKEL | $50,000 |
| KHAL BAIS SHMIEL | $24,000 |
| YESHIVA OF KASHO | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,000 |
| MERCAZ HATORAH VEHACHINUCH | $15,550 |
| CONGREGATION ZICHRON CHAIM | $15,000 |
| CONGREGATION BETH MEDRASH CHASIDIM | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION YETEV LEV | $8,430 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,200 |
| MOSDOS BOBOV - 45 | $6,845 |
| CONGREGATION TIFERES AVROHOM | $5,000 |
| KEREN YAGDIL TORAH | $2,750 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- STSCOTTSDALE TORAH CENTER2× · 2021–2022 · $130k
- CMCONGREGATION MISHKAN TECHESKEL4× · 2021–2024 · $118k
- YOYESHIVA OF KASHO5× · 2021–2025 · $85k
Funded once
- MBMOSDOS BEIT JOSEF TZVIone grant, 2021 · $120k
- CSCONG SHAAREI CHESEDone grant, 2021 · $110k
- CACONTRIBUTION ARE VOLUMINOUS DETAILS AVAILABLE AT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $96k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Hf Foundation · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Shemesh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shemesh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Shemesh Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Shemesh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Shemesh’s filings →