Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Shelk Fischer Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$88kHuman Services$86kPublic Safety & Disaster$68kAnimals$25kEducation$24kFood & Nutrition$15kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KULTURECITY$100,000
TAPS (TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS)$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$6,000
ARMSTEAD ACADEMIC PROJECT$6,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$6,000
WIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME$6,000
WIREGRASS FOOD BANK$6,000
CHILDREN'S OF ALABAMA$5,000
FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION (FAN)$5,000
CANINE ASSISTANTS$5,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED (DOTHAN)$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY OF DOTHAN$5,000
SHEILAH A DOYLE FOUNDATION$3,500
WIREGRASS HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OCHOCOS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION (FAN): $5k → 10%CANINE ASSISTANTS: $5k → 13%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION (FAN): $3k → 10%CANINE ASSISTANTS: $5k → 13%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION (FAN): $3k → 10%CANINE ASSISTANTS: $5k → 13%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION (FAN): $3k → 10%CANINE ASSISTANTS: $5k → 13%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION (FAN): $3k → 10%CANINE ASSISTANTS: $5k → 13%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION (FAN): $3k → 10%CANINE ASSISTANTS: $5k → 13%KULTURECITY: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
MO
VA
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$388k · 19 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$388k
$11k

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CHILDREN'S NATIONAL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $38k · revenue +43%
  • CA
    CANINE ASSISTANTS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +15%
  • TC
    The Children's Hospital of Alabama
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • MA
    MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • TA
    THE ANA PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
3
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
4
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
5
Arms Wide Open Childhood Cancer Foundation

Arms wide open childhood cancer foundation is committed to funding pediatric cancer research, supporting families who are suffering hardship due to their child's cancer diagnosis both financially and emotionally, educating the general…

Health
6
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
7
World Childhood Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

Human Services
8
Canines With a Cause

The mission of Canines With a Cause is to harness the untapped potential of shelter dogs to heal emotional and psychological wounds, provide unconditional love, support and companionship, and give a new leash on life to those in need…

Animals
9
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
10
Arkansas Children's Northwest Inc

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
11
Children's Miracle Network

Children's miracle network (dba "children's miracle network hospitals") works to save kids' lives by bringing people together to raise money for children's healthcare in local communities.

Unclassified
12
The Washington County Humane Society Inc

Rescue and care for stray or unwanted animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Forestry Center; the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of the Ochocos. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KultureCity: $100,000 · Human ServicesKultureCityCANINE ASSISTANTS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCANINE ASSISTANTS INCFamily Access Network Foundation: $20,000 · Human ServicesFamily Access Network FoundationWIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $18,500 · Human ServicesWIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME INCTAPS (TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS): $60,000 · OtherTAPS (TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR…WIREGRASS FOOD BANK: $21,000 · OtherWIREGRASS FOOD BANKCOVENANT CARE INC: $18,000 · OtherCOVENANT CARE INCWIREGRASS SALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · OtherWIREGRASS SALVATION ARMYGIRLS INCORPORATED (DOTHAN): $15,000 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED (DOTHAN)FUR (FELINES UNDER RESCUE): $7,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $6,000 · OtherWORLD FORESTRY CENTER: $6,000 · OtherCROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · Other+2 moreCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $38,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S NATIONALThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $29,500 · HealthThe Children's Hosp…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S …WIREGRASS HUMANE SOCIETY: $13,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OCHOCOS: $12,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $6,000 · AnimalsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $24,000 · InternationalSHEILAH A DOYLE FOUNDATION: $22,000 · EducationWIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyARMSTEAD ACADEMIC PROJECT: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$168,500Other$164,000Health$88,500Animals$31,000International$24,000Education$22,000Philanthropy$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKultureCity: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $38,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCANINE ASSISTANTS INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $29,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHEILAH A DOYLE FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Access Network Foundation: $20,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $18,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetWIREGRASS HUMANE SOCIETY: $13,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OCHOCOS: $12,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD FORESTRY CENTER: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetARMSTEAD ACADEMIC PROJECT: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KultureCity ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CANINE ASSISTANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Hospital of Alabama ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEILAH A DOYLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Access Network Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OCHOCOS ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD FORESTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARMSTEAD ACADEMIC PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shelk Fischer Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shelk Fischer Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Crook County Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • World Forestry Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shelk Fischer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph