Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Shelby and Wanda Amos Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$282kHuman Services$65kEducation$54kHousing & Shelter$17kReligion$14kRecreation & Sports$13kYouth Development$8kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$17,500
DANCING STARS ALZHEIMER'S ASSOC$17,000
SALVATION ARMY WOMEN'S AUXILIARY$1,000
HUGHSTON FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FERST READERS: $1k → 11%HOPE HARBOUR: $13k → 18%HOPE HARBOUR: $10k → 18%HOPE HARBOUR: $10k → 18%HOPE HARBOUR: $3k → 18%HOPE HARBOUR: $2k → 18%HOPE HARBOUR: $1k → 18%HOPE HARBOUR: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$419k · 20 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
72

Total granted

$419k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+38%

Still filing today

40%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $160k · revenue +10%
  • CA
    Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour
    7× · 2017–2024 · $39k · revenue +34%
  • SI
    SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TS
    THE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Housing Initiative Inc

Stabilize neighborhoods through establishing financing, education, rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new housing

Housing & Shelter
2
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
3
Ccmh Corporation

Provide a healthcare facility offering acure care, skilled care, outpatient services, and emergency medical services to residents of carroll county, kentucky and surrounding areas.

Health
4
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
5
Columbus Regional Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence

To work towards the prevention and elimination of domestic and dating violence.

—
6
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
7
Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services
8
Columbus House Inc

Columbus house serves people experiencing homelessness or at imminent risk by providing life-saving outreach, shelter, and housing and by fostering their personal growth and independence. we advocate for and create affordable housing to…

Housing & Shelter
9
Columbus Center for Human Services Inc

Inspiring life journeys

Human Services
10
Columbus Children's Foundation

Accelerating the most effective gene therapy treatments for children with ultra-rare diseases.

Health
11
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
12
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Southern Georgia Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Hughston Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $64,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDANCING STARS ALZHEIMER'S ASSOC: $44,500 · OtherDANCING STARS ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCMISS GEORGIA SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $33,000 · OtherMISS GEORGIA SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · Other+80 more: $172,650 · Other+80 moreMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $160,000 · PhilanthropyMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGI…+2 more: $6,000 · PhilanthropyColumbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour: $39,200 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterVALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterLOVE LIKE LEXI PROJECT INC: $11,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC: $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 · HealthColumbus State University Foundation Inc: $10,500 · EducationCATAULA VOL FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$331,650Philanthropy$166,000Human Services$40,200Housing & Shelter$16,000Health$13,500Education$10,500Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $160,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetColumbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour: $39,200 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE LIKE LEXI PROJECT INC: $11,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetColumbus State University Foundation Inc: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOLUMBUS HOSPICE INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOLDIER MARATHON INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCATAULA VOL FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetKYLE PETTY CHARITY RIDE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding the Valley Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERST READERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUGHSTON FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWesley Glen Ministries Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChattahoochee River Conservancy Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPUS CLUBS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE LIKE LEXI PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Columbus State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLDIER MARATHON INC ↗
  • Who funds CATAULA VOL FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds KYLE PETTY CHARITY RIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley IncGA32.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · Mildred Miller Fort Foundation Inc · Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation Inc · Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc · United Way of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Swift Illges Foundation Inc · John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc · Richard and Helen Robbins Family Foundation Inc · The Loudermilk Family Christian Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shelby and Wanda Amos Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shelby and Wanda Amos Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Shelby and Wanda Amos Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Shelby and Wanda Amos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shelby and Wanda Amos’ filings →

    More from the funding graph