Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Shaw Family Endowment Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$13MEducation$13MInternational$4.2MCrime & Legal$2.8MScience & Tech$2.3MFood & Nutrition$2.0MArts & Culture$1.4MHousing & Shelter$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICARES$500,000
ACTION AGAINST HUNGER$500,000
NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION$500,000
CITY HARVEST$250,000
FEEDING AMERICA$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNITED IN HARMONY: $42k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $25k → 14%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1.0M → 13%UNITED IN HARMONY: $25k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $25k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $25k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $25k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $25k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $25k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $25k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31M · 41 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
10

Total granted

$31M
$4.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+40%

Still filing today

71%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureSocial ScienceInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +50%
  • AA
    ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +37%
  • Feeding America
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • N
    NAACP
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • QC
    QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +64%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FUNDS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center; the most unlike its peers is Bay Area Legal Aid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION: $4,000,000 · OtherNEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATIONMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,500,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERYALE UNIVERSITY: $2,000,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $2,000,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITYNAACP: $1,000,000 · OtherNAACPCOMMUNITY FUNDS INC: $1,000,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FUNDS INCTHE SYMPHONY SPACE INC: $950,000 · Other+24 more: $4,805,000 · Other+24 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,150,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows o…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,000,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBI…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,000,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES O…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $1,300,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute…New York University: $1,000,000 · EducationNew York University+5 more: $780,000 · Education+5 moreAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500,000 · InternationalAMERICARES F…ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $2,500,000 · InternationalACTION AGAIN…NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $2,500,000 · HealthNEW YORK-PRE…THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $1,000,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SI…NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $600,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HE…ST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER: $300,000 · HealthST LUKE'S-RO…NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS: $300,000 · HealthNYU LANGONE …+2 more: $125,000 · HealthTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $1,500,000 · Human ServicesQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesUNITED IN HARMONY: $242,000 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $1,250,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $1,250,000 · Food & NutritionBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 · Community Improvement
Other$18,255,000Education$9,230,000International$5,000,000Health$4,825,000Human Services$2,742,000Food & Nutrition$2,500,000Community Improvement$1,500,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $2,500,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $2,500,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $1,500,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $1,300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $1,000,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1,000,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetNew York University: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SYMPHONY SPACE INC: $950,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC: $600,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $500,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $500,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $450,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetHorace Mann School: $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA LEGAL AID: $300,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMoebius Syndrome Foundation: $300,000 over 3y, 43% of budgetST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED IN HARMONY: $242,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMER ON THE HILL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS OF NEW YORK HARBOR CONSERVANCY DBA FEDERAL HALL CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN PATHWAYS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds THE SYMPHONY SPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Horace Mann School ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA LEGAL AID ↗
  • Who funds Moebius Syndrome Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · Altman Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Fjc · National Philanthropic Trust · The New York Community Trust · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shaw Family Endowment Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shaw Family Endowment Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences: 3% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Shaw Family Endowment Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Shaw Family Endowment Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shaw Family Endowment’s filings →

More from the funding graph