Skip to content
The Seymour Tutelman Family Foundation I at a glance

· Private foundation

The Seymour Tutelman Family Foundation I

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$129k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$383kPhilanthropy$108kHuman Services$49kReligion$46kEducation$38kArts & Culture$31kFood & Nutrition$24kCivil Rights$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
$3,600
Median grant
7
States reached
$777k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF KAREN$25,500
HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
THE BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$10,000
SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION$7,000
THE ALABASTER HOUSE$5,000
FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS$5,000
JEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONS$5,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FIREFIGHTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE$3,600
HOOPS FOR HOPE$3,000
SPROUT SOCIETY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $7k → 13%PROJECT LEGACY: $10k → 20%SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%PROMISE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%PROMISE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $500 → 6%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $5k → 17%COMMUNITY SECURITY SERVICE: $4k → 17%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $10k → 6%COMMUNITY SECURITY SERVICE: $2k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE NY: $1k → 17%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $250 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$484k · 20 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
38

Total granted

$484k
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+27%

Still filing today

85%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF KAREN INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $244k · revenue +20%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2019–2023 · $44k · revenue +43%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    3× · 2018–2024 · $23k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SUSANNA IACOVELLI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FKA PETER AND KARENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +113%
  • OW
    OLD WESTBURY HEBREW CONGREGATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
  • SD
    SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
9
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
10
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
11
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
12
The Foundation for Aids Research

Amfar is dedicated to ending the global aids epidemic through innovative research. (see schedule o)

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Center of Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Susanna Iacovelli Charitable Foundation Inc Fka Peter and Karen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
34/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $243,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF KAREN INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $44,040 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncAlabaster House: $20,500 · HealthAlabaster HouseBELIEVE IN A CURE INC: $12,900 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $12,500 · Health+11 more: $39,200 · Health+11 moreHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCH…OLD WESTBURY HEBREW CONGREGATION INC: $18,000 · OtherOLD WESTBURY HEBREW C…SPROUT SOCIETY: $17,500 · OtherSPROUT SOCIETYHORIZON CHURCH: $9,000 · OtherHORIZON CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant reci…Individual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherKIDS 4 HARMONY: $5,000 · OtherJEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONS: $5,000 · OtherFACING ADDICTION WITH NCADD: $5,000 · OtherSHALOM BAPTIST CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL: $4,800 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL…HOOPS FOR HOPE INC: $5,000 · Other+21 more: $23,960 · Other+21 moreTHE SUSANNA IACOVELLI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FKA PETER AND KAREN: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SUSANNA IACO…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $7,600 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH AP…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropySUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT LEGACY: $10,000 · Human ServicesSONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesPromise of Hope Foundation Inc: $5,500 · Human ServicesCommunity Security Service: $5,400 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $5,000 · Human Services+5 more: $3,750 · Human ServicesThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $20,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $23,000 · Civil RightsTHE GARDINER FOUNDATION: $17,500 · EducationFOOD EDUCATION FUND INC: $5,000 · Education
Health$372,640Other$138,260Philanthropy$108,100Human Services$47,150Arts & Culture$30,500Civil Rights$23,000Education$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $243,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetTHE SUSANNA IACOVELLI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FKA PETER AND KAREN: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $44,040 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlabaster House: $20,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDINER FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetBELIEVE IN A CURE INC: $12,900 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LEGACY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $7,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $7,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPromise of Hope Foundation Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Security Service: $5,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOPS FOR HOPE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFOOD EDUCATION FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SUFFOLK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of the Night: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget18 DEGREES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMPIRE ATHLETICS FOUNDATION CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL HELLENIC SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL MAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANCHOR PROGRAM FUND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Susanna Iacovelli…The Goldman Sachs Cha…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…Fidelity Investments …Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
Jewish Communal FundNY18.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Susanna Iacovelli Charitable Foundation Inc Fka Peter and Karen · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Seymour Tutelman Family Foundation I funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Seymour Tutelman Family Foundation I. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 60%
  • 18 Degrees Inc: 60% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Seymour Tutelman Family Foundation I?

Find your warmest path to The Seymour Tutelman Family Foundation I through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seymour Tutelman Family Foundation I’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home