Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Selfreliance Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
78
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$3.0MArts & Culture$573kEducation$565kYouth Development$304kHuman Services$216kPublic Benefit$120kInternational$105kRecreation & Sports$103kOther$0
02FY2024 · 78 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k41 grants · $147k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $565k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $365k
$7,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Nicholas Ukr Cath Eparchy$95,000
Selfreliance Association$75,000
St Joseph Ukr Cath Church$75,000
St Nicholas Cathedral School$65,000
Sts Volodymyr and Olha Ukr Cath Church$55,000
Immaculate Conception Ukr Cath Church$37,500
Ukrainian Catholic University Found$35,200
Amer Ukr Youth Assoc inc Pavlushkov Bran$35,000
Amer Ukr Youth Assoc inc Vitovsky Branch$32,500
St John the Baptist UCC Whippany$30,000
Plast Inc$25,000
Ukrainian National Museum$25,000
St Nicholas Ukr Cath Cathedral$25,000
St Andrew Ukr Orth Cathedral$25,000
St Volodymyr Ukr Orth Cathedral$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Selfreliance Association: $75k → 14%Selfreliance Association: $75k → 14%Selfreliance Association: $35k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 82 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

82 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
61

Total granted

$4.3M
$409k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+2%

Still filing today

26%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $666k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyReligionPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · $211k · revenue +167%
  • SA
    Selfreliance Association
    3× · 2022–2024 · $185k · revenue +182%
  • UI
    UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF MODERN ART
    7× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • IC
    Immaculate Conception Ukrainian Byz
    one grant, 2019 · $82k
  • SJ
    St John the Baptist UCC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • SJ
    St John the Baptist Ukrainian Catholic Church
    one grant, 2020 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc
Education
2
United Americans for United Ukrainians

Providing services to Ukrainian Citizens

International
3
Iowans for Ukrainians
Philanthropy
4
Ukrainian Academy of Arts & Sciences in the U S Inc

Research, advancement and promotion of Ukrainian studies and culture in the United States.

Arts & Culture
5
Ukraine Relief Fund Inc
International
6
Utah Ukrainian Association

Focusing on amplifying Ukrainian voices, organizing community rallies and fundraisers, and sending aid to address critical humanitarian needs in Ukraine and assisting parolees and refugees in the USA.

International
7
American Ukranian Relief Association

American Ukranian Relief Organization (the Organization) intends to help Ukranians suffering from the war with Russian federation. As a volunteer based organization comprised mostly of Ukranians, the Organization would like to help bring…

International
8
Ukrainians of Colorado

We actively and zealously work to develop awareness, knowledge and understanding about Ukraine in Colorado and beyond. We work hard to raise funds to provide medical and humanitarian aid to Ukrainians through a network of established…

Arts & Culture
9
Ukrainian Foundation

In 2006, Ukrainian Foundation was established by the immigrants from Ukraine to help the Ukrainian refugees adjust to their new home in the United States. Our base is in Portland, OR, a home to over 100,000 immigrants from Ukraine. With…

Human Services
10
Ukrainian Cultural Club of Dallas

We dedicate our efforts to promoting and showcasing Ukrainian arts, music, and dance, organizing Ukrainian cultural events, supporting cultural family-friendly activities, educating interested youth and adults in folklore arts. We are also…

Arts & Culture
11
Ukrainian Federation of America Inc

To support services and programs which contribute to the preservation, enrichment and promotion of ukrainian identity, language and culture.

International
12
Ukrainian Hearts Foundation Corporation

Humanitarian support for ukraine

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian Congress Committee of America; the most unlike its peers is Sc Connection-Ua Npf. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Joseph Ukrainian Catholic Church: $284,500 · OtherSt Joseph Ukrainian Catholic ChurchSt Nicholas Cathedral School: $240,000 · OtherSt Nicholas Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy: $225,500 · OtherSts Volodymyr and Olha Ukrainian Catholic Church: $220,250 · OtherImmaculate Conception Ukrainian Catholic Church: $202,500 · OtherSt Nicholas Ukrainian Catholic Epar: $160,000 · OtherST VOLODYMYR UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL: $158,500 · Other+164 more: $3,127,770 · Other+164 moreUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $210,600 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionHromovytsia Ukrainian Dance Ensemble NFP: $60,000 · Arts & CultureUKRAINIAN NATIONAL HOME OF JERSEY CITY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureVYSHYVANKA: $42,500 · Arts & CultureUKRAINIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureUkrainian American Archives & Museum Inc: $17,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSelfreliance Association: $185,000 · Human ServicesUKRAINIAN GENOCIDE FAMINE FOUNDATION USA INC: $44,000 · PhilanthropySAVED DREAMS INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyUKRAINIAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $2,000 · PhilanthropyRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $17,000 · InternationalUMANA Foundation: $9,000 · InternationalHELP HEROES OF UKRAINE INC NFP: $5,000 · InternationalU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,000 · InternationalUKRAINIAN AMERICAN VETERANS: $30,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,619,020Religion$212,600Arts & Culture$205,000Human Services$185,000Philanthropy$51,000International$35,000Public Benefit$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $210,600 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetSelfreliance Association: $185,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetUKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF MODERN ART: $135,000 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetAMERICAN UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $112,000 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetAMERICAN UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $66,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetHromovytsia Ukrainian Dance Ensemble NFP: $60,000 over 6y, 32% of budgetUKRAINIAN NATIONAL HOME OF JERSEY CITY: $50,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetUKRAINIAN GENOCIDE FAMINE FOUNDATION USA INC: $44,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetVYSHYVANKA: $42,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetUKRAINIAN AMERICAN VETERANS: $30,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetUKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICA: $25,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetUKRAINIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $25,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetSC Connection-UA NPF: $21,500 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetUkrainian American Archives & Museum Inc: $17,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $17,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUkrainian Resistance Foundation: $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBAHRIANY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetUMANA Foundation: $9,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetShevchenko Scientific Society Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSAVED DREAMS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UKRAINIAN BANDURISTS CHORUS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUKRAINIAN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN FREE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST SOPHIA RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUKRAINIAN NATIONAL WOMENS LEAGUE OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROTEZ FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Selfreliance Association ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Hromovytsia Ukrainian Dance Ensemble NFP ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN NATIONAL HOME OF JERSEY CITY ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE FAMINE FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds VYSHYVANKA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Heritage Foundation of First Security Federal Savings Bank IncIL47.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Heritage Foundation of First Security Federal Savings Bank Inc · Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc · The Polsky Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · UMANA Foundation · The Maria Hulai Lion Foundation Inc · Ukrainian Community Foundation of Philadelphia · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Selfreliance Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Selfreliance Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Selfreliance Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Selfreliance Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 190 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Selfreliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph