Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Scudder Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$157k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$188kInternational$164kFood & Nutrition$156kHealth$121kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kHousing & Shelter$44kHuman Services$32kCrime & Legal$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $127k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$3,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nature Conservancy$29,500
Doctors Without Borders$9,000
Central City Concern$8,000
World Food Program USA$8,000
American Red Cross$6,500
Oregon Food Bank$6,000
Mercy Corps$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc$5,500
Good Shepherd Food Bank (Maine)$4,200
Union of Concerned Scientists$4,000
Innocence Project$4,000
Virginia Garcia Memorial Foundation$4,000
Philabundance$4,000
Meals on Wheels People$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $3k → 9%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $8k → 14%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $3k → 9%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $8k → 14%Comfort Zone Camp: $3k → 9%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $8k → 14%World Food Program USA: $8k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $8k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $7k → 14%Innocence Project: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
KY
VA
MD
NM
AR
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of The Scudder Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 28% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 35%.

The Scudder Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$721k · 36 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
2

Total granted

$721k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-37%

Still filing today

72%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +79%
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $47k · revenue +578%
  • Central City Concern
    6× · 2019–2024 · $44k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • GS
    Good Shepherd Food Bank (Maine)
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • VG
    VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue -37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
6
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
7
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rivers & Birds Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
26/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $88,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYOREGON FOOD BANK: $34,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKNATURE CONSERVANCY: $26,300 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMERCY CORP: $23,000 · OtherMERCY CORPHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $21,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN: $19,200 · OtherTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERNIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherAmigos Bravos Inc: $10,800 · Other+7 more: $48,700 · Other+7 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $51,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONT…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $22,800 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $21,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $21,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCER…WORLD VISION INC: $18,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCMercy Corps: $12,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsCentral City Concern: $43,500 · HealthCentral City Conce…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $22,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $21,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOS…VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $18,000 · HealthVIRGINIA GARCIA ME…COLUMBIA RIVER HEALTH: $12,000 · HealthCOLUMBIA RIVER HEA…NORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $12,000 · HealthNORTH BY NORTHEAST…+1 more: $4,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $47,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $38,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE P…COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesCOMFORT ZONE CA…MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $26,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON …Philabundance: $23,500 · Food & NutritionPhilabund…Good Shepherd Food Bank: $21,000 · Food & NutritionGood Shep…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $21,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $21,000 · EnvironmentRivers & Birds Inc: $10,800 · EnvironmentOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $9,200 · Community Improvement
Other$307,500International$146,300Health$133,000Human Services$115,500Food & Nutrition$71,000Environment$52,800Community Improvement$9,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $88,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $51,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $47,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCentral City Concern: $43,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $34,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $26,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPhilabundance: $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $22,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN: $19,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA RIVER HEALTH: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAmigos Bravos Inc: $10,800 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRivers & Birds Inc: $10,800 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $9,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMain Line Animal Rescue Inc: $8,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds THE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA RIVER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds NORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Amigos Bravos Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rivers & Birds Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds Main Line Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Medical Teams InternationalOR13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Medical Teams International · Careoregon Inc · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Scudder Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Scudder Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • The Wallace Medical Concern: 27% of income from government
  • Columbia River Health: 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center: 11% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • North By Northeast Community Health Center: 4% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Scudder Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Scudder Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scudder Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph