Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Scott J Seligman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$318k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$164k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$276kArts & Culture$54kPhilanthropy$29kInternational$25kHuman Services$20kCivil Rights$10kCommunity Improvement$10kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $164k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA FE JEWISH CENTER - CHABAD$163,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SF$25,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$25,000
70 FACES MEDIA$22,500
Individual grant recipient$17,500
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
VALUE CULTURE$10,000
JDC AMERICAN JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$10,000
ARIZONA JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$7,900
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHABAD OF NOVI$3,600
TEMPLE BETH EL$2,950
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$2,500
GUARDIANS OF THE CITY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
NJ
RI
CA
AZ
NM
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$102k · 9 repeat orgs$312k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$102k
$61k

Still filing today

0%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2025 · $20k
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF FORTH WORTH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k

Funded once

  • TC
    TEMPLE CHAI
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF MILL VALLEY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCOgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +98%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
2
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
3
Jewish Federation of the Sacra

To serve and enrich the Jewish community and those who support and identify with it, in the greater Sacramento area, Israel, and the world.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
5
Jewish Community Foundation of the West

To enhance charitable giving; facilitate philanthropy both locally and worldwide; and build permanent financial resources to strengthen organizations and programs that serve the Jewish families of Northern California

Philanthropy
6
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
7
University of Judaism Foundation
—
8
Jewish Food Society Inc

Jewish food society works to preserve and celebrate jewish culinary heritage from around the world in order to increase awareness and deepen connections to jewish life. jfs is committed to showcasing the diversity of the jewish experience,…

Arts & Culture
9
American Jewish Historical Society

See schedule o - the american jewish historical society (the "society") is the oldest ethnic, cultural archive in the united states. the society provides access to more than 30 million documents and 50,000 books, photographs, art and…

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Federation of El Paso and Las Cruces

Serving the jewish community by engaging, connecting, supporting and celebrating jewish life, values and culture in el paso, las cruces, israel and beyond.

—
12
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Value Culture. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA FE JEWISH CENTER - CHABAD INC: $163,500 · OtherSANTA FE JEWISH CENTER - CHABAD INCTEMPLE CHAI: $25,000 · OtherTEMPLE CHAITEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT: $19,700 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROITIndividual grant recipient: $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF FORTH WORTH: $16,500 · Other+24 more: $104,530 · Other+24 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $25,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $2,500 · PhilanthropyJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · International70 FACES MEDIA INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5,000 · Human ServicesANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$348,730Philanthropy$28,500International$25,000Arts & Culture$23,500Human Services$20,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget70 FACES MEDIA INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 70 FACES MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Value Culture ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Jewish Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds JGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Seligman Family FoundationMI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Seligman Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Scott J Seligman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Scott J Seligman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Scott J Seligman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Scott J Seligman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scott J Seligman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph