Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Scott D and Carol a Nelson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$141kYouth Development$30kHuman Services$28kRecreation & Sports$19kPublic Benefit$15kHealth$14kArts & Culture$12kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RISEN AGENDA$14,339
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$13,000
HUNTS FOR THE BRAVE$11,000
YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER$10,010
Individual grant recipient$5,165
YOUTH IMPACT$5,000
BANK OF UTAH COATS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,000
HUNTSMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION$1,030
WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY$800
ALS ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$297k · 17 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$297k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+471%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YF
    YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +41%
  • MB
    MAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LEADERSHIP LEGAC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $7k · revenue +345%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • WC
    Weber County School District Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +471%
  • LL
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
3
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
5
Salt Lake Education Foundation

To promote student success in the Salt Lake City School District by using private donations to supplement children's educational experiences.

Philanthropy
6
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
7
The Utah Tech University Foundation

To promote and support Utah Tech University previously Dixie State University and its various scientific educational and other activities programs and services.

Education
8
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
9
Real Salt Lake Foundation
Human Services
10
Park City Education Foundation

Our mission is to fund and support educator-powered initiatives that inspire all Park City students to reach their academic and lifelong potential.

Education
11
Canyons School District Education Foundation

Canyons School District Education Foundation works in tandem with community and business partners to build support for public schools and to advance Canyons School Districts mission to help every student become college- and career-ready…

Education
12
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ycc Family Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Major Brent Taylor Leadership Legac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $72,000 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYWEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $55,500 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITYYOUTH IMPACT INCORPORATED: $30,400 · OtherYOUTH IMPACT INCORPORATEDCATHOLIC COMMUNITY: $19,850 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITYRISEN AGENDA INC: $19,339 · OtherRISEN AGENDA INCHUNTS FOR THE BRAVE: $15,100 · OtherHUNTS FOR THE BRAVEECCLES COMMUNITY ARTS: $11,840 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,475 · Other+12 more: $39,949 · Other+12 moreYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $20,540 · Human ServicesYCC FAMIL…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED W…MAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LEADERSHIP LEGAC: $7,000 · EducationWeber County School District Foundation: $3,325 · EducationOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,700 · EducationFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $1,750 · EnvironmentAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $500 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $206 · Health
Other$274,453Human Services$27,540Education$13,025Environment$1,750Health$706

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $20,540 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LEADERSHIP LEGAC: $7,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWeber County School District Foundation: $3,325 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $1,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LEADERSHIP LEGAC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Weber County School District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rechieve FoundationUT15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rechieve Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · America First Credit Union Charitable Foundation · Nebeker Family Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · The Community Foundation of Utah · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Scott D and Carol a Nelson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Scott D and Carol a Nelson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scott D and Carol a Nelson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph