Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Schoenbaum Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$514k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of THE SCHOENBAUM FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $394k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $745k
  • $250k+2 grants · $864k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAMPA JCC AND FEDERATION$514,330
OPERATION LIFESHIELD INC$350,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$192,950
JEWISH FED OF GREATER ATLANTA$125,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$122,400
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW ORLEANS$75,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA$65,000
GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR$55,000
FLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSUEM$55,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$54,400
EXPERIENCE LEARNING INC$47,638
Individual grant recipient$47,292
TEMPLE BETH SHALOM$30,000
MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK$30,000
SALVATION ARMY - SARASOTA$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $521k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TAMPA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 13%FEED THE SECOND LINE: $9k → 23%TAMPA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 13%FEED THE SECOND LINE: $8k → 23%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $55k → 9%TAMPA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $9k → 13%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $47k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR OF MANATEE: $20k → 10%TAMPA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $9k → 13%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $35k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR OF MANATEE: $20k → 10%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $30k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR OF MANATEE: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $7k → 14%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $25k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR OF MANATEE: $5k → 10%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $15k → 12%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $25k → 9%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $10k → 12%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $25k → 9%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $10k → 12%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $25k → 9%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $10k → 12%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $25k → 9%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $10k → 12%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $25k → 9%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $8k → 12%GLASSERSCHOENBAUM HUMAN SVCS CTR: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
WV
NM
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.6M · 36 repeat orgs$750k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
9

Total granted

$6.6M
$379k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+12%

Still filing today

61%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GLASSER SCHOENBAUM HUMAN SERVICES CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $332k · revenue +229%
  • EL
    EXPERIENCE LEARNING INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $200k · revenue +29%
  • FLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $174k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $180k · revenue -51%
  • M
    MACCABI
    one grant, 2023 · $64k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $43k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family Services of Greater Orlando Inc

Jewish family services of greater orlando (jfs orlando) provides services to stabilize individuals and families in crisis and enhances the quality of life across generations to all members of the central florida community. annually, our…

Human Services
2
Jewish Family Service

Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…

Human Services
3
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

4
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

6
Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc

The mission of the greater miami jewish federation is to mobilize human and financial resources to care for those in need, strengthen jewish life and advance the unity, values and shared purpose of the jewish people in miami, in israel and…

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

8
Jewish Fertility Foundation Inc

The jewish fertility foundation (jff) engages hopeful parents by providing financial assistance, emotional support, and infertility education to those struggling to build their families.

Health
9
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

10
Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc

The mission of jewish community services is to improve the quality of life and self-sufficiency of the jewish and broader communities throughout south florida in accordance with jewish values.

Human Services
11
Jewish Food Society Inc

Jewish food society works to preserve and celebrate jewish culinary heritage from around the world in order to increase awareness and deepen connections to jewish life. jfs is committed to showcasing the diversity of the jewish experience,…

Arts & Culture
12
Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles

Jfsla's mission is to provide life-improving services that help the people of los angeles live with dignity and exercise self-determination. we believe in and strive for a more compassionate los angeles where no one has to navigate life…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tampa Jewish Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is The West Virginia Land Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based Senior LivingLand Conservation Organizat…Youth Development CentersCommunity Health CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Food Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr15%11%20–35yr9%54%35–55yr12%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr15%18%20–35yr9%34%35–55yr12%33%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,007

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
29/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FED OF GREATER ATLANTA — $722,260 · OtherJEWISH FED OF GREATER ATLANTAJEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW ORLEANS — $427,687 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW ORLEANSCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM — $299,700 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTA — $245,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SARASOTAIndividual grant recipient — $207,492 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE BETH SHALOM — $175,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOMTHE SALVATION ARMY — $150,000 · OtherSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc — $135,000 · Other+22 more — $779,123 · Other+22 moreTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC — $1,376,467 · Recreation & SportsTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INCEXPERIENCE LEARNING INC — $200,451 · Recreation & SportsEXPERIENCE LEARNING INCBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $780,450 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUND…OPERATION LIFESHIELD INC — $350,000 · InternationalOPERATION LIFESHIELD IN…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $228,240 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL D…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $180,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAG…+1 more — $21,600 · InternationalTHE GLASSER SCHOENBAUM HUMAN SERVICES CENTER — $332,160 · Human ServicesCLOTHES TO KIDS INC — $63,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesTAMPA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $42,200 · Human Services+2 more — $23,400 · Human ServicesMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC — $172,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $60,260 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $55,000 · Food & NutritionALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $7,000 · Food & NutritionFLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC — $173,700 · Arts & CultureClearwater Free Clinic Inc — $88,000 · HealthThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc — $39,480 · Health
Other$3,141,262Recreation & Sports$1,576,918International$1,560,290Human Services$520,760Food & Nutrition$319,260Arts & Culture$173,700Health$127,480

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC — $1,376,467 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $780,450 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION LIFESHIELD INC — $350,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTHE GLASSER SCHOENBAUM HUMAN SERVICES CENTER — $332,160 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $228,240 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEXPERIENCE LEARNING INC — $200,451 over 6y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $180,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC — $173,700 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC — $172,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc — $135,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetClearwater Free Clinic Inc — $88,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC — $71,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHillels of Georgia Inc — $65,400 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS INC — $63,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $60,260 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE INC — $60,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTAMPA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $42,200 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc — $39,480 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHALOM AUSTIN — $34,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $25,480 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $21,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $20,080 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $20,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SARASOTA AND DESOTO COUNTIES INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFeed the Second Line — $16,400 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc — $9,320 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SHARE INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S GUARDIAN FUND — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank — $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPERATION LIFESHIELD INC
  • Who funds THE GLASSER SCHOENBAUM HUMAN SERVICES CENTER
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE LEARNING INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds FLORIDA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc
  • Who funds Clearwater Free Clinic Inc
  • Who funds THE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds Hillels of Georgia Inc
  • Who funds CLOTHES TO KIDS INC
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE INC
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC
  • Who funds TAMPA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds The William Breman Jewish Home Inc
  • Who funds SHALOM AUSTIN
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds SOME INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gulf Coast Community Foundation IncFL15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Schoenbaum Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Farm Share Inc6% of income from government
  • Tampa Jccfederation Inc3% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
  • Florida Holocaust Museum Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph