Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Schlesinger Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.1MReligion$154kHealth$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kHuman Services$22kPhilanthropy$20kYouth Development$8kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEEDS - Access Changes Everything$32,000
Labshul$20,900
Individual grant recipient$13,900
Individual grant recipient$2,575
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Southernvision$1,000
DRM Foundation Inc$1,000
OVERLOOK FOUNDATION$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY$512
Covenant House$261
Memorial Sloan Kettering$250
GoFundme$250
Vertical Raise$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IMMERSENYC: $554 → 20%HIDDEN WATER: $515 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
MN
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 19 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
40

Total granted

$1.3M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-1%

Still filing today

53%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +42%
  • SL
    STORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +80%
  • OF
    OVERLOOK FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $42k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • S
    Seeds
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • TC
    The Conscious Kid
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue -94%
  • DO
    DAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue -86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
5
New Schools Fund

To improve public education by identifying and supporting the most promising education ventures in the country, and creating a nationwide network of education entrepreneurs committed to closing the achievement gap.

Education
6
Solving Kids' Cancer Inc

Skc impacts children through the initiation of clinical research trials of investigative treatment strategies. our vision is to continue expanding the armamentarium of effective and less toxic treartment strategies for pediatric…

Health
7
Just Capital Foundation Inc

Just capital's mission is to build a more just economy that works for all americans by helping companies improve how they serve all their stakeholders - workers, customers, communities, the environment, and shareholders - as defined by the…

Social Science
8
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
9
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
10
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
11
The V Foundation

We fund game-changing research and all-star scientists to accelerate victory over cancer and save lives.

Health
12
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Jersey Seeds Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vertical Raise Np Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
17/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC+7 more: $77,993 · Education+7 moreIndividual grant recipient: $45,830 · OtherIndividual gran…SUMMIT VOLUNTEER FIRST AID: $40,000 · OtherSUMMIT VOLUNTEE…Seeds: $29,600 · OtherSeedsIndividual grant recipient: $19,100 · OtherIndividual gran…Individual grant recipient: $15,498 · OtherIndividual gran…+39 more: $59,735 · Other+39 moreONE SPIRIT LEARNING ALLIANCE LTD: $72,600 · ReligionONE SPIRI…STORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC: $51,492 · ReligionSTORAHTEL…OVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $42,220 · HealthDAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM CENTER: $7,400 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,100 · Health+5 more: $3,077 · HealthNETWORK FOR GOOD: $11,530 · Public Safety & DisasterDRM FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $1,024 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $825 · PhilanthropyCity Squash Inc: $5,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $100 · Recreation & Sports
Education$1,077,993Other$209,763Religion$124,092Health$57,797Public Safety & Disaster$11,530Philanthropy$5,849Recreation & Sports$5,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetONE SPIRIT LEARNING ALLIANCE LTD: $72,600 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetSTORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC: $51,492 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $42,220 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEW JERSEY SEEDS INC: $32,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMARKETING RESEARCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $29,340 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $11,530 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM CENTER: $7,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCity Squash Inc: $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHNJ INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDRM FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetThe Joseph School Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMORNINGSIDE CENTER FOR TEACHING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY INC: $2,575 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTackle Tomorrow: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRESTORE NYC INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $1,024 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANAR WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $825 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $777 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED BUILDERS INC: $554 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIDDEN WATER INC: $515 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE SPIRIT LEARNING ALLIANCE LTD ↗
  • Who funds STORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC ↗
  • Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY SEEDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARKETING RESEARCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds The Conscious Kid ↗
  • Who funds DAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHNJ INC ↗
  • Who funds DRM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Joseph School Inc ↗
  • Who funds MORNINGSIDE CENTER FOR TEACHING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Tackle Tomorrow ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANAR WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Ford Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schlesinger Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schlesinger Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Sanar Wellness Institute Inc: 80% of income from government
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Nourishnj Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Unity Charter School: 11% of income from government
  • Daughters of Miriam Center: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Schlesinger Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Schlesinger Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schlesinger Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph