Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Scheumann Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$725k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$5.7MEducation$881kHuman Services$812kRecreation & Sports$802kReligion$348kAnimals$155kPhilanthropy$145kFood & Nutrition$137kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $495k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$200,000
SALVATION ARMY$145,000
LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION$75,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$75,000
LAFAYETTE FAMILY YMCA$35,000
LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY$35,000
NORTHEND COMMUNITY CENTER$30,000
O'CONNOR HOUSE$25,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$20,000
ASSET INC DBA IMAGINATION STATIO$20,000
LAFAYETTE JEFFERSON CHOIR BOOSTERS$10,000
WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
L & A PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
OUT RUN THE SUN$10,000
INDIANAPOLIS ZOO$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $30k → 14%SHELTERING WINGS: $3k → 5%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%SHELTERING WINGS: $3k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS: $3k → 5%THE VILLAGES OF INDIANA: $25k → 16%THE VILLAGES OF INDIANA: $25k → 16%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 19%WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 19%WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 19%WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 19%WABASH CENTER: $1k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 19%WABASH CENTER: $1k → 19%WABASH CENTER: $1k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 19%WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $35k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $12k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $5k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $4k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $3k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $3k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $3k → 19%HEARTFORD HOUSE: $10k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $5k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $5k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $5k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $5k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 34 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
17

Total granted

$4.6M
$5.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+22%

Still filing today

53%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Ball State University Foundation Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $189k · revenue +49%
  • FF
    FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $132k · revenue +65%
  • LU
    LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • FC
    FAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2017 · $5.0M · revenue -63% · 43% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laporte County Habitat for Humanity

The purpose of the organization is to build houses for families who are financially distressed. this is a local affiliate of habitat for humanity international.

—
2
Lifetime Housing Group Inc

Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
5
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
6
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
7
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
8
Humane Society for Hamilton County

Humane Society for Hamilton County (HSHC) is saving lives, educating communities and completing families by providing a compassionate and healthy environment for the homeless animals of Hamilton County, Indiana, until they can be placed…

Animals
9
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
10
Joliet Area Community Hospice Corp

The mission of the lightways hospice and serious illness care is to provide comprehensive, holistic, community based support services and care for terminally ill persons, their caregivers and loved ones without regard to economic status,…

Human Services
11
Glenburn Home Inc
Health
12
Greater Laporte Chamber of Commerce Inc

Chamber of commerce for laporte, indiana

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Villages of Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Long Center Inc Long Center for the Performing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $5,000,000 · Housing & ShelterFAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $677,000 · OtherRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $573,928 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYSALVATION ARMY: $479,800 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFAITH CHURCH: $285,000 · OtherFAITH CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $208,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $190,000 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · Other+29 more: $859,000 · Other+29 moreLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $685,000 · PhilanthropyTHE O'CONNOR HOUSE: $75,000 · Human ServicesLAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC: $62,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesThe Villages of Indiana Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesGroup Homes for Children Inc: $34,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesCAREGIVER COMPANION INC: $20,000 · Human Services+3 more: $20,500 · Human ServicesBall State University Foundation Inc: $189,222 · EducationLAFAYETTE JEFFERSON CHOIR BOOSTERS INC: $15,000 · EducationFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $132,000 · Food & NutritionGreater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc: $42,100 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionHUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC: $100,000 · AnimalsAlmost Home Humane Society Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $10,000 · Animals
Housing & Shelter$5,000,000Other$3,597,728Philanthropy$685,000Human Services$348,000Education$204,222Food & Nutrition$179,100Animals$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $5,000,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $685,000 over 9y, 39% of budgetBall State University Foundation Inc: $189,222 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $132,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE O'CONNOR HOUSE: $75,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetLAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC: $62,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUTRUN THE SUN INC: $55,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetThe Villages of Indiana Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc: $42,100 over 3y, 11% of budgetLong Center Inc Long Center for the Performing: $42,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetGroup Homes for Children Inc: $34,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGOLDEN BRONCHO CLUB INC: $27,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCommunity Cancer Network Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCAREGIVER COMPANION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetLAFAYETTE JEFFERSON CHOIR BOOSTERS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetHeartford House Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAlmost Home Humane Society Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWABASH CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetBOONE COUNTY CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ball State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE O'CONNOR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTRUN THE SUN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Villages of Indiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds Greater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds Long Center Inc Long Center for the Performing ↗
  • Who funds Group Homes for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN BRONCHO CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Cancer Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAREGIVER COMPANION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE JEFFERSON CHOIR BOOSTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Lafayette Community FoundationIN30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Lafayette · Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation · Sia Foundation Inc · Coffin Family Foundation Inc · James K and Mary Jo Risk Family Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · North Central Health Services Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The McAllister Foundation · Arconic Foundation · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Scheumann Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Scheumann Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scheumann’s filings →

More from the funding graph