Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sanguinity Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$153k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$563kEducation$421kHuman Services$175kYouth Development$127kPhilanthropy$102kScience & Tech$100kHealth$95kArts & Culture$77kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,400
Median grant
4
States reached
$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$50,000
THE JAZZ LOFT INC$35,000
PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND$16,500
NORTH SHORE MONTESSORI SCHOOL$11,448
THE THORN TREE PROJECT$7,800
NEW YORK CARES INC$5,400
WOMENFORWOMENORG$5,289
Individual grant recipient$5,150
RESOLVE THE NATIONAL INFERTILITY ASSOCIATION$5,100
ST JAMES 5 MILE CHALLENGE$5,000
STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC$3,500
MAKEAWISH AMERICA$2,662
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOMEN'S REFUGE COMMISSION: $60k → 17%ARTICLE3ORG: $3k → 10%WOMEN'S REFUGE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S REFUGE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM: $5k → 16%WOMEN'S REFUGE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $10k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $10k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $10k → 17%ISLAND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $5k → 7%ISLAND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $2k → 7%COMMUNITY SOLIDARIITY: $2k → 7%COMMUNITY SOLIDARITY: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
AZ
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 30 repeat orgs$213k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
24

Total granted

$1.5M
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+24%

Still filing today

73%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $325k · revenue +273%
  • PW
    PIVOT WORKS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $200k · revenue +24%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    3× · 2020–2022 · $105k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • BT
    BEAM THE ART OF PROBLEM SOLVING
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • AF
    ACAP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
5
Women Deliver Inc

Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.

Education
6
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
7
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
8
Womens Foreign Policy Group Inc

Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…

International
9
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
10
Scholars At Risk Inc

Scholars at risk (sar) is an international network of institutions and individuals whose mission it is to protect scholars, promote academic freedom, and defend everyone's freedom to think, question and share ideas.

International
11
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Aids Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIVOT WORKS INC: $200,010 · InternationalPIVOT WORKS INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $116,586 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNIC…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $75,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $15,000 · International+1 more: $10,173 · InternationalSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $324,500 · EducationSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION I…North Shore Montessori School: $56,733 · EducationNorth Shore Montessori S…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSIGMACAMP: $48,204 · OtherSIGMACAMPIndividual grant recipient: $39,588 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROOMTOGROWORG: $31,324 · OtherROOMTOGROWORGBEAM THE ART OF PROBLEM SOLVING: $25,000 · OtherBEAM THE ART OF PROBLEM SOLVI…PCOS CHALLENGE INC: $25,000 · OtherPCOS CHALLENGE INCACAP FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherACAP FOUNDATIONTHE THORN TREE PROJECT: $18,200 · OtherTHE JAZZ LOFT INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE JAZZ LOFT INCNEW YORK CARES INC: $35,155 · OtherNEW YORK CARES INCPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $24,500 · Other+20 more: $136,273 · Other+20 moreRonald McDonald House Global: $105,000 · HealthRonald Mc…THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $30,000 · HealthTHE FOUND…RESOLVE Incorporated: $7,600 · HealthTHE LONG ISLAND DOULA ASSOCIATION INC: $6,665 · Health+2 more: $7,575 · HealthWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC: $105,200 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S R…WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN MOV…ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $6,510 · Human Services+4 more: $11,619 · Human Services+4 moreCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $100,000 · Science & TechCHILDREN AND SCREENS-INSTITUTE OF DIGITAL MEDIA AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC: $70,750 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC: $5,100 · Youth Development+1 more: $2,500 · Youth Development
International$436,769Education$386,233Other$468,244Health$156,840Human Services$153,329Science & Tech$100,000Youth Development$78,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $324,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPIVOT WORKS INC: $200,010 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $116,586 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC: $105,200 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $105,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN AND SCREENS-INSTITUTE OF DIGITAL MEDIA AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC: $70,750 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE JAZZ LOFT INC: $60,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetNorth Shore Montessori School: $56,733 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $35,155 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $24,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $10,173 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROATIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRESOLVE Incorporated: $7,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGALLERY NORTH INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LONG ISLAND DOULA ASSOCIATION INC: $6,665 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $6,510 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACTORS THEATRE WORKSHOP INC: $4,580 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLIDARITY INC: $3,619 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAchilles International Inc: $3,575 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $2,575 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIVEWILD DANCE COMPANY INC: $2,557 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetJESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThree Village Historical Society: $2,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetARTICLE3ORG: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Allen & Eve Foundation IncMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Allen & Eve Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sanguinity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sanguinity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sanguinity’s filings →

More from the funding graph