· Private foundation
The Sanford and Phyllis Beim Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of THE SANFORD AND PHYLLIS BEIM FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $106k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VALLEY BETH SHALOM SYNAGOGUE | $56,010 |
| DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| ZIEGLER SCHOOL OF RABBINICAL STUDIES | $30,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES | $20,000 |
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $15,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF LOS ANGELES | $10,000 |
| LA MUSIC CENTER OPERA | $10,000 |
| LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| VISTA DEL MAR CHILD CARE SERVICES | $5,000 |
| UCLA HILLEL | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL | $5,000 |
| IKAR | $5,000 |
| ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL DAY SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $5,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DTDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · $404k · revenue +7%
- CHChildren's Hospital Los Angeles8× · 2017–2024 · $149k · revenue +78%
- LALOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- HHHIGHLAND HALL WALDORF SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $1k
- IMINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…
To assure that dermatologists have access to the highest quality education, research and innovations in the field, and that patients and the public have access to the highest quality medical and surgical dermatologic care and to…
To increase educational equity by providing joyful, enriching learning experiences for middle school students, aspiring teachers, and experienced educators.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The pardes jewish day school prepares students to become outstanding members of society through a rigorous secular and judaic education, a nurturing community, and a foundation in reform judaism that welcomes all jewish traditions.
To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is De Toledo High School and the most unlike its peers is International Myeloma Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds PICO UNION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Law Foundation of Silicon Valley ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Sanford and Phyllis Beim Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.