· Private foundation
The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k115 grants · $154k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $209k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $723k
- $250k+1 grant · $310k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE | $310,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $200,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $160,000 |
| IMPACT FORUM FOUNDATION | $117,500 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES | $110,000 |
| LANGE FOUNDATION | $80,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $55,150 |
| FRIENDS OF THE IDF | $30,000 |
| PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH | $21,224 |
| OPENDOR MEDIA | $20,000 |
| DOWNTOWN DOG RESCUE | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION | $19,125 |
| MOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.
212 repeat relationships: 99 still active in FY2024, 113 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $312k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IEISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE5× · 2017–2023 · $860k · revenue +122%
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER6× · 2017–2023 · $446k · revenue +63%- TPTURNING POINT USA INC5× · 2018–2024 · $398k · revenue +967%
Funded once
- SWSTAND WITH USone grant, 2018 · $176k
- AJAMERICAN JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEEone grant, 2018 · $90k
- MFMERONA FOUNDATION (TAPZIT)one grant, 2023 · $36k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
How this is measured
226 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 226 of the 440 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds IMPACT FORUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds LANGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLARION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL MOBILITY ↗
- Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
- Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROCLAIMING JUSTICE TO THE NATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds HOLD ON TO YOUR MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LAWFARE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Farrell Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · California Community Foundation · John P & Kathryn G Evans Foundation · The Lewis Family Charitable Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Snider Foundation · Eric Javits Family Foundation · Usher Family Foundation · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
- Willamette University: 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
- Cadena Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Sandra & Lawrence Post Family’s filings →