Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The San Francisco Japantown Foundation

Organization is established to provide financial support of cultural, charitable, and educational activities and services for the benefit of residents, visitors, and other stakeholders of san francisco japantown and services that promote such activities.

$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$206kCommunity Improvement$125kHuman Services$110kEducation$99kYouth Development$26kCivil Rights$20kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $59,190 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $71,340 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,150 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$54,040
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLDEN GATE INSTITUTE INC$54,040
JCCCNC$5,150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL: $16k → 10%NIHONMACHI LITTLEFRIENDS: $15k → 10%NIHONMACHI LITTLEFRIENDS: $15k → 10%KIMOCHI: $15k → 10%JAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL: $10k → 10%JCYC: $8k → 10%NJAHS: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$520k · 10 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$520k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+16%

Still filing today

90%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GOLDEN GATE INSTITUTE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $105k · revenue +211% · 44% of their budget
  • HN
    HOKKA NICHI BEI KAI
    2× · 2021–2023 · $45k · revenue +34% · 41% of their budget
  • JC
    JAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL
    3× · 2019–2023 · $40k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • SM
    SOTO MISSION OF SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +97%
  • GA
    GENRYU ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
2
Seattle Cherry Blossom and Japanese Cultural Festival Committee

Cultural education.

Recreation & Sports
3
Nihonmachi Merchants Association

Promote San Francisco's Japantown

4
Nikkei Matsuri Foundation Inc

Our mission is to perpetuate the japanese american experiences, cultural customs, and traditions. we do this in part by hosting the annual nikkei matsuri festival in san jose japantown, providing a forum for sharing cultural exhibits and…

Arts & Culture
5
Nanka Kenjinkai Kyogikai Inc

To promote goodwill between the united states and japan, cultural exchange, education, and to encourage appreciation of the cultural heritage of various japanese prefectures in the kansai region of japan.

Arts & Culture
6
Japanese Festival of Houston Inc

Introduce the public to and educate the public on japanese culture

Arts & Culture
7
Nikkei for Civil Rights and Redress

To initiate and participate in activities that will promote the history, culture and social welfare of the japanese american community in southern california.this includes education about the world war ii incarceration of japanese american.

Unclassified
8
Japanese American Cultural Center of Vista

To promote and foster the understanding and appreciation of japanese and japanese american art, history, and culture. to preserve and disseminate inforation about the japanese american way of life to promote the study of the japanesese…

Arts & Culture
9
Japanese American Citizens League Silicon Valley Chapter

The Japanese American Citizens League is a national organization whose ongoing mission is to secure and maintain the civil rights of Japanese Americans and all others who are victimized by injustice and bigotry. The leaders and members of…

10
Nisei Week Foundation Inc

To educate the public on japanese and japanese-american history and culture.

Arts & Culture
11
Japanese Amer Citizens League Pacific Southwest District Council

To advocate for the civil and human rights of Japanese Americans and others, and to educate about and preserve the cultural heritage and values of Japanese Americans.

Community Improvement
12
Asunaro

To introduce Japanese traditional and modern art and culture to public through supporting small NPO organizations, having the seminar and workshop for all different age groups. Asunaro is charitabloe, cultural, and educational non profit…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Japanese Cultural and Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Hokka Nichi Bei Kai. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOLDEN GATE INSTITUTE — $105,240 · OtherGOLDEN GATE INSTITUTEJAPANTOWN TASK FORCE INC — $90,000 · OtherJAPANTOWN TASK FORCE INCNational Japanese American Historical Society Inc — $36,500 · OtherNational Japanese American Historical Society …SOTO MISSION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $20,000 · OtherSOTO MISSION OF SAN FRANCISCOJAPANESE CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $75,150 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY CENT…HOKKA NICHI BEI KAI — $45,000 · Arts & CultureHOKKA NICHI BEI KAISAKURA MATSURI INC — $34,000 · Arts & CultureSAKURA MATSURI INCNICHI BEI FOUNDATION — $29,500 · Arts & CultureNICHI BEI FOUNDATIONGENRYU ARTS — $15,000 · Arts & CultureGENRYU ARTSJAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL — $40,000 · Human ServicesJAPANESE COMMUN…Nihonmachi Little Friends — $30,000 · Human ServicesNihonmachi Litt…KIMOCHI INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesKIMOCHI INCJAPANTOWN COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRICT INC — $35,000 · Community ImprovementJAPANTOWN …JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE — $20,000 · Community ImprovementJAPANESE A…Parent Teacher and Community Council of the Japanese Bilingual Bicultural Prog — $15,000 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $6,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$251,740Arts & Culture$198,650Human Services$85,000Community Improvement$55,000Education$15,000Recreation & Sports$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOLDEN GATE INSTITUTE — $105,240 over 4y, 44% of budgetJAPANESE CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $75,150 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetHOKKA NICHI BEI KAI — $45,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetJAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNational Japanese American Historical Society Inc — $36,500 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetJAPANTOWN COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRICT INC — $35,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSAKURA MATSURI INC — $34,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetNihonmachi Little Friends — $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNICHI BEI FOUNDATION — $29,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGENRYU ARTS — $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetParent Teacher and Community Council of the Japanese Bilingual Bicultural Prog — $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetKIMOCHI INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Ja Community Foundation · Asian Pacific Fund · Kinjiro and Eiko Moriguchi Fund · KT Foundation · The Henri & Tomoye Takahashi Charitable Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The San Francisco Japantown Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The San Francisco Japantown Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The San Francisco Japantown Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph