· Public charity
The San Diego Women's Foundation
See schedule o.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $148k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO | $60,000 |
| SERVING SENIORS | $60,000 |
| SAY SAN DIEGO | $37,500 |
| CASA FAMILIAR | $30,000 |
| BAYSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER | $30,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COALITION | $10,000 |
| URBAN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT | $10,000 |
| HARVEY FAMILY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| OLIVEWOOD GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER | $10,000 |
| SANDIEGO350 | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $756k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EOELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO3× · 2021–2025 · $126k · revenue +1%
- MSMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT3× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue +38%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC2× · 2018–2020 · $110k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- MMMENDING MATTERSone grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
- FTFREE TO THRIVEone grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue -89%
- GIGENERATEHOPE INCone grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
Catholic Charities provides social services and administers various governmental and social programs. Designed to meet the challenge of the ever-changing community by utilizing spiritual, human and financial resources, our programs enable…
Dreams for Change's mission is to respond to the needs of San Diegans by creating innovative and cost-effective programs to empower and stabilize the lives of under-served families and individuals.
Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…
La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…
We advocate for the full economic, social, and civic inclusion of refugees and displaced populations in the San Diego region, throughout California, and across the country.
Somali Family Service, guided by its community champions, empowers immigrants, refugees and other underserved communities in San Diego through its programs that promote health, educational and economic success, and leadership development.
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
Institute of Public Strategies (IPS) is a nonprofit corporation that receives its funding from local and federal governmental agencies and private foundations, through long-term grants or contracts to provide community-level services…
To provide transformative legal services that enable diverse communities in East Palo Alto and beyond to achieve a secure and thriving future.
San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Second Families. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds SERVING SENIORS ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds SURVIVORS OF TORTURE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MENDING MATTERS ↗
- Who funds FREE TO THRIVE ↗
- Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
- Who funds BAYSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GENERATEHOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS ↗
- Who funds Casa Cornelia Legal Services ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ROOTS FARM ↗
- Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds Think Dignity ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds PROJECT CONCERN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds LOGAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AJA PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CITY HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA FAMILIAR INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DAVID'S HARP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUITARS IN THE CLASSROOM ↗
- Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds Episcopal Community Services ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS LEGAL SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc ↗
- Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties · The Parker Foundation · Sempra Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · The Country Friends
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The San Diego Women's Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.